Skip to comments.
Judicial Watch: Clinton IRS Turned Blind Eye To Terrorists
Sunday Sept. 23, 2001
| Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff
Posted on 09/23/2001 7:38:21 PM PDT by truther
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
To: truther
The IRS was too busy auditing Jesse Jackson. Not!
To: timestax
Bump again!
22
posted on
09/24/2001 6:14:27 AM PDT
by
aristeides
(demosthenes@olg.com)
To: aristeides
I wonder if it's just a coincidence that Sept. 11 happened when Clinton was out of the country, in Australia. Does anybody know whether it is true that Hillary was not at the U.S. Senate when it was evacuated?I have wondered the same thing myself and have heard from several people that shillery was not in the building when it was evacuated. I also wonder who else wasn't there.
Don't know about you but I smell a rat..........
To: Steve Schulin
"the constant barrage of this kind of thing is still stunning. Another big thank you to Larry Klayman is in order." Ditto!
24
posted on
09/24/2001 7:29:39 AM PDT
by
ChaseR
To: truther
"ARE YOU LISTENING, NY JEWS WHO HELPED TO ELECT HILDEBEAST LAST FALL?" 1 Posted on 09/23/2001 19:38:21 PDT by truther
Easy now ...I'm not from New York but I'm one of hundreds of thousands of Jews - who are conservative. :)
25
posted on
09/24/2001 7:31:41 AM PDT
by
ChaseR
To: truther
(last figure I had on New York proper - 7-8% of the Jews living there - are consevatives)
26
posted on
09/24/2001 7:32:56 AM PDT
by
ChaseR
To: ChaseR, Steve Schulin
bump
To: truther
They are obviously very adept at using our good qualities against us.
Comment #29 Removed by Moderator
To: Achille
bump
30
posted on
09/24/2001 9:51:45 AM PDT
by
timestax
Comment #31 Removed by Moderator
To: Dick Bachert, Snow Bunny, Old Lady, goldilucky, Mudboy Slim, ALOHA RONNIE, LarryLied, backhoe, all
"The decision not to investigate these groups is especially difficult to understand given that the information in the Judicial Watch complaint is hardly a state secret. On the contrary, the complaint is based largely on reports published over the last three years in venues like the New York Times." Well treasonous bastard Bill Clinton - what do you have to say about this?
32
posted on
09/24/2001 12:33:10 PM PDT
by
ChaseR
To: Achille
"If we allow Hillary to run, and women to vote, Hillary will take the next presidential election, all male jokes notwithstanding. Because women now vote in large numbers, she will be the next "president" (in a manner of speaking)." LOL...the Disgust the HildaBeast generates in my wife is exceeded only by the Disgust she generates in my Mom!! Women AND Men looooove to despise Hitlery, and she has about as much a chance of winning the Presidency as "Butch" Reno has of winning the Florida Governor's Office...that is, NONE!!
FReegards...MUD
BTW...can you just see the Civil Unrest that would be happening now if the HildaBeast was sitting in the Oval Office?! Or even her slimey MateFerLife?!
To: truther
This is the same Charles Rossotti that insists that he be treated different than other governmental employees. He has not had to sell his stock in AMS, Inc., the company that he started and that earns most of its business from the IRS. Of course, Mr. Rossotti enjoys the dividens from the company as well as his wife is a successful attourney that has the AMS, Inc. account. Therefore, she obtains profits from her husbands handouts also. This was a Clinton appointee. However, Congress has agreed to the special deal that Mr. Charles Rossotti enjoys. Why? Why?
To: ChaseR
While Bill Clinton's IRS pursued his personal enemies with great enthusiasm -- auditing Billy Dale, Gennifer Flowers, Paula Jones, Juanita Broaddrick and dozens more -- America's enemies, it seems, got a free pass from the same agencyGood summation.
The "legacy issue" is falling like the cheap house of cards it always was-
"baked wind,"
to use P.J. O'Rourke's catchy phrase....
35
posted on
09/24/2001 2:43:25 PM PDT
by
backhoe
To: ChaseR
All JW needs is to follow the money trail.
To: Irma, ChaseR
It would be interesting to know why Judicial Watch made its initial decision to oppose President Bush back in September of las year.
Was it a calculated risk that President Bush would be so liberal that there would be a lot of potential conservative contributors?
Or was it fear that if Bush won the election that all contributions would dry up?
Or was is a personal vendetta because he didn't agree to let JW host one of the presidential debates? Or some other personal slight?
I bet JW is kicking itself in the arse right now seeing the President's approval in the 90s.
37
posted on
09/24/2001 3:52:55 PM PDT
by
bayourod
To: bayourod
Nah. If decent people were elected to powerful positions, they'd be out of work.
Comment #39 Removed by Moderator
To: Achille
"You ASSUME what women will do in the polling booth." I can only ASSUME the actions of women I associate with, and IMHO, the Aura of the HildaBeast is Medyuh-generated and not shared by a majority of the American Sheeple.
FReegards...MUD
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson