Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Froufrou
we have to factor in Ginsberg and her liberal associates. I'm not sure they would even hear the case!
Certainly, considering that after I wrote this Congress passed, President Bush signed, and SCOTUS rejected an appeal of, the blatantly unconstitutional McCain-Feingold. That certainly is discouraging.

But since then Roberts and Alito have joined SCOTUS, replacing Rhenquist (who voted against McCain-Feingold) and O'Connor (who voted to uphold it). The ruling in favor of McCain-Feingold was a 5-4 decision, so if both Alito and Roberts uphold the Constitution then McCain-Feingold will be overturned when next it is considered (unless a conservative retires before a liberal does, which is relatively unlikely).


1,104 posted on 09/17/2006 4:20:38 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1101 | View Replies ]


To: conservatism_IS_compassion

That's my take on it too. I imagine with any luck that W will have one more shot at replacing a liberal SCOTUS chief justice.


1,106 posted on 09/18/2006 7:16:46 AM PDT by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson