I have been struggling for the right adjective for these people whose response to all this is "kill, kill, kill" and "bomb-them-back-to-the-stone-age" and "kill them all, women and children first" and "we must inflict pain" and "send them to hell," etc.
You have hit the nail on the head: These "patriotic" and "macho" hysterics are actually a sign of feminization.
These people consistently speak in terms of push-button war from the air. They care nothing about what happens in the world, or to America, in the coming decades, whereas real masculinity is concerned about the long-term. It is typical of the homosexual, state-worshipping, fascist mentality not to care about the long run. Remember the fascistic, homosexual Keynes's dictum, when asked about the long-run implications of his money-printing nostrums: "In the long run, we are all dead."
They don't want to hear anything about American behavior that might actually have aroused hatred for America. Our killing of millions of people through bombs and starvation during the past fifteen years has nothing to do with it!
These "patriotic," "macho" people who are screaming for blood and bombs and destruction are having a screaming, epicene hissy fit. They are a symptom of the feminization of our society--only this feminization in their case is disguised by the fact that they are calling for blood.
I still say that we all are advocating the most LONG-TERM policy suggested. We should inflict such carnage that, unto the 50th generation, their children's children's children cringe when they hear an aircraft overhead or hear the roar of a diesel engine. It should be a destruction so vast and so complete that it enters their mythology as God himself taking vengeance on their people.
You can call this feminization or whatever you want. I want them dead and, if it comes to it, it will be face-to-face if necessary. I see it as feminization and hysterics when someone decides that they would just as soon not do anything about the situation, just lay there and take it.
Just like a pu$$y.
This subject is roiling beneath the surface of so many of the other subjects that pop up around here; the relationship between our transformation from a Republic--which is a masculine form of government--into an empire--which is always effeminate; the ways republics make wars as opposed to Empires; the war between the sexes that has been sponsored by the very people who are whipping up blood lust today. (Gender feminists, as we all know, are the geisha girls of plutocratic capitalism.)
Oh, it's a rich, rich vein to mine. Maybe too rich....
My ancestor who fought with Charles Martel at the Battle of Tours (against Islam!!) was prepared to die to defend Christianity and the West. My ancestors who brought King John to book at Runnymeade were willing to die to protect their liberties. My forebears who fought in the French and Indian War, the Revolution, the War of 1812, the Civil War, the Spanish American War, WWI, and WWII were willing to die, and in several cases did, to preserve their liberties and way of life. We must be prepared at this time to do whatever is necessary to defend the West and our liberties against radical Islam. It will neither be easy nor quick. We have no other choice but surrender. And, I, for one, am not willing to stand aside and let these scum, for that is what they are, win. I hate war, as Sherman did. But if we must wage it, we must wage it with the utter ruthlessness that ensures that no one will ever desire to fight us again.
If you haven't the stomach for the coming war, then stand aside and let America get on with what's necessary.
We don't have a choice about going to war. We are there. The question is whether we fight or surrender.
I was going to say that the option was DeGaulle or Petain. but that isn't true. Petain, whatever you think of him, at least had the excuse that his nation had been defeated in the field and was no longer capable of engaging in large-scale regular warfare.
The option here is DeGaulle...or Quisling.
Who, When, Why and by Whom? Fess up or shut up! Substantiate Please!!!
I killed no one in a foreign country and I doubt anyone in the WTC did! I don't control the economy of third world countries and I doubt anyone in the WTC did. What's your point? These innocent people have suffered DEATH at the hands of Terrorist Murderers that are out of control.
Poverty stricken Americans have yet to make the news in blowing up Mecca.(sarcasm) How dare you justify, in the least, the actions of these madmen based on their impoverishment. Also, it seems that you blame the worlds problems on America!? Is this true?
Terrorism is the most hiddeous of the intrinsic evils because it PREYS on the UNSUSPECTING INNOCENT. Like a cancer, it needs to be surgically removed.