Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HitmanNY
It did used to. The 5th Amendment prohibits the Federal Government from infringing on a person's life, liberty, or property without due process of law.

True. The expression "liberal construction" had confused someone into thinking it means "liberal agenda," so there was a brief digression into laws about sodomy. It was in that context that I made my comment about the 14th Amendment. But you're quite right. The Congress itself was always so limited, but Congress never legislated about matters of strictly local concern.

38 posted on 07/07/2005 3:35:03 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas. The List-O-Links is at my homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: PatrickHenry
I don't think I'm confused at all. The liberals use exactly your "liberal construction" when "emanating" new "rights" which have no basis in the law. You may not think sodomy is a "right" protected by the ninth amendment, but liberals sure do.
39 posted on 07/07/2005 6:30:37 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson