Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Married Episcopal priest will become priest in Roman Catholic Diocese of Scanton
virtueonline ^ | Jan 4 04 | David Virtue

Posted on 01/04/2005 2:34:33 PM PST by churchillbuff

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 261-267 next last
To: churchillbuff

I've never understood why Catholics believe their priests shouldn't be married. Then again, I've never understood the Catholic priest thing in the first place.


161 posted on 01/05/2005 3:40:04 PM PST by k2blader (It is neither compassionate nor conservative to support the expansion of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seamole

I see a dating service opportunity here ...


162 posted on 01/05/2005 3:42:35 PM PST by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

Comment #163 Removed by Moderator

To: sinkspur

Does your knee show no sign of failing on you? ;o)


164 posted on 01/05/2005 4:15:47 PM PST by iconoclast (Conservative, not partisan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: eastsider

"I was thinking more about transferring before seminary. Or are they on to that, too? : )"

No - that can be done! However, while the Eastern Catholics can ordain married men to the diaconate in the West, in theory they are still not supposed to ordain them to the priesthood.

Having said that, if your Arabic is good and you and your wife can stand living in Syria for a few years, it is possible. (Good test of a vocation I suppose!!!)

;)


165 posted on 01/05/2005 4:15:51 PM PST by Tantumergo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

"The priests I work with are good men, but they take very few evening appointments, insisting that they need that time to "read, meditate, and prepare homilies." "

Really? Do they have floodlit golf courses in the States?

:)


166 posted on 01/05/2005 4:18:10 PM PST by Tantumergo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

Comment #167 Removed by Moderator

To: Rytwyng

That's an interesting point of view.

I just never thought of Jesus that way.


168 posted on 01/05/2005 7:07:32 PM PST by Palladin (Proud to be a FReeper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods
The Roman priets were allowed to marry for the first 1000 or so years...
This is a myth as is the myth that being married would somehow bring closure to sexual abuse.

The truth is that the Church's obligation of celibacy goes back to the apostles in an “unbroken” line. And the motivation for celibacy was the closer following of Jesus Christ, who required his apostles to leave wife and family, to become soley "married" to Him and His church.

169 posted on 01/05/2005 7:17:52 PM PST by vox_freedom (Fear no evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Palladin
You are living in an alternate universe.

Okay. You don't believe in the doctrine of the Incarnation. I get it.

170 posted on 01/05/2005 7:19:40 PM PST by wideawake (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

What a silly remark.

I just don't believe in some of your interpretations of that particular doctrine.

What advanced degrees do you hold in Theology, and from what source?


171 posted on 01/05/2005 7:22:00 PM PST by Palladin (Proud to be a FReeper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: eastsider

"homosexual, coined in 1892, solecistically combines the Greek homo with the Latin-based sexual. The word homoerotic is preferable because it combines the Greek homo with the Greek-based erotic."


oookie-dokie. If it works for you...:)


172 posted on 01/05/2005 7:26:14 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Reo

Another ROFTER! Cheers.


173 posted on 01/05/2005 7:28:52 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: murphE; thor76; pascendi; Land of the Irish; Canticle_of_Deborah; ultima ratio; sinkspur; ...

I'm surprised at how many people are willing to "chuck" something that they really don't understand. The arrogance of neo-Catholics (and Protestants) who don't comprehend the wisdom of the Church through the ages will never cease to amaze me.

This will help:

Excerpt from the taped interview of Fr. Malachi Martin by Bernard Janzen :The Eternal War: the Priesthood in Crisis:
(transcription by me)

"...the idea is to do away with the priesthood. The thing that really militates against the popular taste today about priesthood is celibacy. They regard nowadays, in the society in which we live, the expression of sexuality whether within marriage...outside of marriage whether by yourself or with somebody of the same sex, or with an animal is regarded as quite normal.... If you don't "frighten the horses" so to speak. Provided you don't violate any "rule of decent living".

The idea that men, young men of twenty say,..take a vow of celibacy. That they will never get married. And that they can keep that without getting twisted and psychologically moronic and finally ending up in pedophilia or sadism or in some twisted psychology. That is the normal attitude towards priests today. So the idea of Roman Catholic celibacy is something that is utterly alien to the mind.

Why? Because the idea of priesthood is. And this is where the great lack in teaching in seminaries and in the Catholic populace lies.

You see...a priest..Christ was once asked, (they pointed out a eunuch to him... a eunuch was somebody who accidentally or for some reason or another couldn't have sex. His genitals were destroyed or something.)
And somebody said to him, "Lord what do you think of the eunuch? And he said,"There are three kinds of eunuchs. There's the man who's born like that from nature." ( Deficient in other words, he hasn't got the where-with-all). "There's the one who men made a eunuch." (Because they used to castrate people to make them eunuchs because eunuchs are very useful in palaces. 'cause they wouldn't touch the women and they were very good guards. And eunuchs always developed a very great cruelty. I suppose in reaction to their mutilation. And also if you did that, the voice remained high-pitched and beautiful through teenage years. And then he said, "There is a third kind of eunuch who does it to himself for the sake of the kingdom of God. He said, very mysteriously, "whoever understands, let him understand," [Fr. Martin then quotes the phrase aloud in Latin]....meaning there is a very deep mystery.

The mystery is this: I can look on my celibacy if I am a priest, as a chastity belt. And the Church has locked it and thrown away the key. In that case then, I'm just somebody deprived of what I should have a right to by a greater force that's thrown away the key.

That's not celibacy at all. That is enforced continence.

I can look on celibacy then as something acceptable to the Church but a pain in the neck or a pain somewhere else. I still am very far from it.

The celibate is somebody who says to himself or herself (a nun), "My greatest power of love is in reproduction and in living with another human being. And in having children and in exchanging our love and warmth and friendship and confidence. And giving each other the intimacy of our very being, soul and body, which a true marriage does.

But, I will give that up because..when I become a priest, Christ puts a seal on my soul. The seal of his priesthood. And that seal cordons me off for a higher destiny. And the destiny is to have a very, very particular union with God, with Christ.

And that union is the union of somebody who is going to hold God's body in his hands at Mass. And is going to be a special emissary bringing blessing and shriving people from their sins and healing their souls. That's what true celibacy is. It's a segregation of your soul from all the lovely things in life that human love can bring and marriage can bring.

By the way, Look. It also has its ills and its difficulties but in general, it's regarded as a great benefit to be married. Or to live with somebody as we do nowadays. [sarcasm from Fr. Martin]

But to cut that off deliberately and to do it lovingly and to make it a positive contribution, and to devote all the energies that nature has given us for human love... to devote them to Christ. And to concentrate all that on..the Sacrifice of Christ and the preaching of his Gospel and the transmission of his message of love and salvation to souls and healing them and shriving them and helping them supporting them guiding them and welcoming them to the truth. That is the highest vocation a man can have.

Similarly with a nun who takes a vow of chastity. The same thing, She says to herself, "I'm going to imitate Our Lady, who is a virgin. who is the Mother of God. I'm going to have spiritual children and most of Our Lady's children are spiritual. (She had only one child of her own who was called Jesus.) But, I'm going to have those children by my prayers and by my identity with the great mother: The Mother of God.

And I'm going to do all that by renouncing this: Not because it's ill or bad. It's not bad, It's good. God made it. It's good, he said, 'Increase and multiply, love each other, be one flesh. It's a sacrament in the New Covenant. But I'm going to renounce that because I'm going to have a greater identification with Our Lady because God is calling me to that. And all the love and sympathy and empathy and the perceptiveness of love, I'm going to transfer that to Our Lady and Our Lord. And I'm going to make that my special sacrifice."

And in the beginning it is a sacrifice. And then, with the passage of time and fidelity, suddenly...this flower blooms in their souls.
And they achieve this marvelous tranquility and this marvelous warmth that people always saw in the traditional priest. This amazing power to get inside you. This light, this feeling that they were there for you. They weren't riven in their sympathies. And they were there for you because Christ was their man, Christ was their King, Christ was their High Priest. That idea of priesthood....you won't find that anywhere today in Catholic manuals or preached in sermons or anything like that. Celibacy is regarded as...like Fish on Friday , a law we want to change and do away with."


174 posted on 01/05/2005 10:12:25 PM PST by Gerard.P (If you've lost your faith, you don't know you've lost it. ---Fr. Malachi Martin R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods

Yep. My g'grandaddy was a bishop! (not kidding)


175 posted on 01/05/2005 10:19:35 PM PST by patton (+)(+)(+)(+)(+)(+)CHUNK!D@MMMMMIT!(+)(+)(+)(+)(+)(+)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Gerard.P

Thanks for posting this. :^)


176 posted on 01/05/2005 10:26:13 PM PST by murphE ("I ain't no physicist, but I know what matters." - Popeye)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: conservlib; ninenot
Do you suppose that the husbands of wives who must be far away for an extended period of time (military, business, care of parents or whatever) cast a lustful eye on the newspaper boy until she returns? Of course not. Then what makes you believe that allowing marriage for Roman Rite Catholic clergy will do anything to reduce child molestation by homosexual predators who have joined the clergy having no interest whatsoever in women?

Catholic authorities will run the Catholic Church without the uninformed opinions of outsiders. If Western societies were obsessed with theft or murder, should we encourage thievery and murder among the clergy?

177 posted on 01/05/2005 10:59:15 PM PST by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

To vindicate the parable of the workers and the vineyard?


178 posted on 01/05/2005 11:00:26 PM PST by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Very nice. Thanks.


179 posted on 01/05/2005 11:01:11 PM PST by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
I don't know whether Fr. Neuhaus has ever married but I know that there is a Fr. Lockwood in the St. Louis Archdiocese who is a married father of many children who was a Missouri Synod Lutheran pastor and was accepted into the Roman Catholic Church and ordained a priest. He is not alone.

Another consideration favoring the admission to the priesthood of those non-Catholic clergy who are married upon conversion to Catholicism is that it would be quite unjust to the clergyman's wife to suggest that divorce should be his path to the Catholic priesthood but not at all unjust to require him not to remarry if she should die (which also is a requirement of the permanent diaconate, is it not?). I suspect that the RCC would similarly admit Orthodox married clergy. Perhaps, the provision should extend to those of other Christian religions. Marcus Grodi, Gerry Matatics (at least years ago when my wife and I were acquainted with him), and some of the other converts from Presbyterianism would probably make first class priests. Obviously we are not going to admit women clergy from any of those Churches, as Pope John Paul II has definitively ruled.

The world ought conform to us and not vice versa.

180 posted on 01/05/2005 11:27:58 PM PST by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 261-267 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson