[tacticalogic]

Mr. Filburn was engaged in interstate commerce, yes. Mr. Filburn was more than happy to accept the government's money.

That's not what I asked. Was Filburn an interstate carrier, an "instrument of interstate commerce" under direct control of the ICC?

"by reason of their control of the carriers....."

[robertpaulsen]

And I bet you think the decision in Wickard v Filburn only applies to wheat? C'mon.

Oh, BTW, the Shreveport Rate Cases were cited in support of the decision in Wickard v Filburn, so we know our judiciary is not as confused as you.