If the guilt of Milosevic is so obvious, why the Hague Tribunal has such difficulties with proving it? Can you explain it?
When has a kangaroo court ever worried about evidence?
For the same reason it is difficult to legally prove Hitler ordered the holocaust - everybody knows he did it, but there is a scarce paper trail proving the fact.
And in Milosevic's case, the documentary evidence is still to some extent under the control of his friends in the Serbian Defence Ministry, hence the Damocles sword of trade sanctions still hanging over Belgrade's head.
Nevertheless, with what documentary evidence that has been brought forth, and the vast body of non-Serb controlled information, Slobo's neck has been fitted with his noose.
That neither you, nor your friends here can recognize a rope when you see one is ultimately not my, nor the rest of the world's concern - you may as well be trying to rehabilitate Ceausescu.