Ping.
That selfishness is responsible for many problems today.
By definition, yes. Just wait long enough and we'll have different orientations screaming for legitimacy.
Homosexual Agenda Ping - A Really Good Summary of Why Two Homosexuals Wanting to "Marry" Each Other Has NOTHING To Do With Civil Rights.
And why comparing themselves to black people - interracial marrying - is a lie, and insulting to racial minorities everywhere.
I do take issue with this statement, though:
"No one really believes that there is no such thing as moral freedom, that there is no right or wrong it's impossible to live in this world without fundamental convictions on truth and falsehood. The homosexual lobby itself cannot really believe this nonsense."
I think some of the homosexual radicals DO think there is no such thing as right and wrong, nor do some believe in moral freedom.
Let me know if anyone wants on/off this pinglist.
Oops sorry I posted this without doing a search...
Rev. JLP BTTT
If you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)
Extra warning: this is a high-volume ping list.
As the kids of today would say... "That is soooo gay."
(Imagine... all those years of trying to change their image by using the word "Gay" by the Homosexual groups, and the new generation has totally undone all that work bwaaaaaaaaahahahahahahaha)
Dennis Prager was talking yesterday about the need for an instruction manual for life. We all have that instruction manual, but for those who don't read it or believe in it, what case can be made against two men getting "married?" The people who were against blacks and whites getting married had no Biblical basis for their position. In fact, we see that people of different skin colors do get married in the Bible. But G-d says very clearly that homosexual sex is a sin. Some people are willing to accept the case that a child needs a mother and father, but many people think that doesn't matter. So what can you tell them? People who want to live without G-d's Instruction Manual ultimately make their decisions based on subjective happiness.
Buy this guys book. He is great. I bought two copies myself.
There is no moral equivalency here.
The cakeboy and sappho crowd are reaching and attempting to co-opt a mantle for political recognition gain and they should be rebuked.
Once again, paternalistic (superior in their mind) liberals are screwing over the same folks they pretend to help or identify with.
Most fembots are lesbos actually.
Well written.
The comparison of the gay so-called civil rights movement and the black one is entirely spurious. The reason is that the fundamental legal rationale for the activism of the black civil rights movement was the passage of the 14th amendment, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. All of this legislation was passed after much debate and implemented through the small r republican process. This current movement is being fueled by activists and a radical elite contravening the democratic process through judicial activism and the illegal intercession of certain elected officials.
This is a tremendously insulting thing - prancing deviate sodomites trying to "steal valor" from people that have experienced horrific hardship. The good news is, the "straight man doin' me wrong" gambit won't survive people finding out that these beasts have higher incomes than decent people.
This is a tremendously insulting thing - prancing deviate sodomites trying to "steal valor" from people that have experienced horrific hardship. The good news is, the "straight man doin' me wrong" gambit won't survive people finding out that these beasts have higher incomes than decent people.
Actually marriage IS a right. You have to be adjudged incompetent in order to loose the right to marry. It is no different than the right to be mother or father.