Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gabz
Thank you for your prayers for my mother. It is hard to watch someone go through.

Maybe I was unclear, but my concern about smoking and personal freedom was meant for business owners, too. Removing the ability to have smoking on your premises just doesn't seem like a negative. You stated that if I believe smoking can be prohibited, then conversely the mandating of smoking should be permitted. I get your point. I just don't understand why a business owner would WANT to purposely increase the chances of their patrons getting lung cancer.

I don't like government intrusion into my life any more than you do. But in the instance of smoking, less is always better.

152 posted on 04/03/2004 11:08:27 AM PST by Reddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]


To: Reddy
The lingering illness of anyone, for any reason is a horrible experience for anyone.

I'm glad you seem to get at least part of my point. In the case of these smoking bans, many of them, including NYC, NYS and Delaware, they effect EVERY business, not just bars and/or restaurants. What you are advocating is the denial of a property owner to freely use his/her property as they see fit.

There is absolutely no statistically significant proof that exposure to the tobacco smoke of others does anything more than possibly exacerbate an already existing condition or be annoying to some people.

Is smoking a healthy habit? I don't know anyone who would say yes, including myself. Is it a sure thing death sentence to anyone that does it? Absolutely not.

And by going along with the statistics, a non-smoker has a higher chance of getting lung cancer from drinking whole milk than from exposure to second hand smoke. Of course neither risk is statistically significant and therefore should not be given any significant notice.

I do not promote smoking, in fact I am the first to be supportive of those who choose to stop doing so, but on the other hand, I despise the misuse of science and statistics to promote something that actually amounts to nothing more than social engineering.

I truly wisdh that even 1/4 of the money, time and effort that has been invested in attacking smokers and the businesses that choose them as their customers was spent in shutting down the abortion industry........which is a 100% proven killer. In my 20+ years of professional involvement with government (I do not and have never worked for any government agency) I have found a very common thread among those who support a woman's right to "choose" - they are among the most vocal in working to remove choices in other areas whether it be seat belts, guns, or smoking.
155 posted on 04/03/2004 11:50:57 AM PST by Gabz (End Freepathons!!!!!!!!!!!!!.........contribute today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson