To: philetus
Prove it. If any parent deliberately, continuously and needlessly burns something which releases potential carcinogens and other chemicals within close proximity to the child on a regular basis, that parent is abusive.
But if you believe burning who-knows-what in the vicinity of a child is okay, then you should be able to argue with a straight face that we should smoke in neonatal units, pipe tobacco smoke into a child's room to help calm his nerves while he sleeps, and stick him in the middle of a crowded car full of smokers.
To: VRWC_minion
Most cities' air is as bad as smoking a pack a day.
I and two siblings were raised in a smoking household.
I raised four kids in a smoking household.
I know many people who were raised in a smoking household.
If second hand smoke was anywhere near as bad as you and all the enviro wackos make it out to be,no one raised in a smoking household would live to be an adult.
34 posted on
02/28/2004 1:42:30 PM PST by
philetus
(Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get)
To: VRWC_minion
If any parent deliberately, continuously and needlessly burns something which releases potential carcinogens and other chemicals within close proximity to the child on a regular basis, that parent is abusive. I've got a fire burning in my woodstove right now..........burning wood releases potential carcinogens - are we going to be banning woodstoves and fireplaces next???
57 posted on
02/28/2004 3:03:36 PM PST by
Gabz
(The tobacco industry doesn't pay cigarette taxes - smokers do!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson