No matter how well reasoned and researched the information you present, the main argument against active smoking and the influence of ETS will remain; it stinks.
And this simple aesthetic concern will be the nail that seals the coffin on tobacco users.
The state's use of our children against us as a means of behavioral modification will not stop at this one funeral.
Whether the health claims are true or not, they have been accepted as if they were true. Therefore, whem a state has laws that are designed to protect adults from the harm of second hand smoke, its illogical for them not to have laws to protect children from SHS.