[MineralMan]

"Substitute "guns" for "pit bull" and you have the liberal argument for gun control.
"

Nonsense! Guns cannot attack anyone on their own. Pit bulls can, and do, with considerable regularity. For a while, someone was posting a daily story about a pit bull attack, until the Admin folks started moving all such stories to chat. Now only the most heinous stories get posted.

Firearms are harmless unless they are used by a human being. Pit bulls act on their own. There is no comparison, and your argument diminishes the RKBA.

[DugwayDuke]

Sorry folks, it's the same argument and the same logic. Pitbulls (guns) are just too dangerous and should be banned. You two just happen to have a thing about pit bulls while gun banners have a thing about guns. It's the same philosophy too. Somethings are just too dangerous for some people therefore they should be done away with.

BTW, I don't own a pitbull and I find the breed unattractive. I much prefer Danes and Mastiffs. Of course, there are some who think those breeds are too large and should also be done away with.