To: DugwayDuke
"Substitute "guns" for "pit bull" and you have the liberal argument for gun control.
"
Nonsense! Guns cannot attack anyone on their own. Pit bulls can, and do, with considerable regularity. For a while, someone was posting a daily story about a pit bull attack, until the Admin folks started moving all such stories to chat. Now only the most heinous stories get posted.
Firearms are harmless unless they are used by a human being. Pit bulls act on their own. There is no comparison, and your argument diminishes the RKBA.
28 posted on
02/16/2004 10:47:24 AM PST by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
To: MineralMan; tiamat
Sorry folks, it's the same argument and the same logic. Pitbulls (guns) are just too dangerous and should be banned. You two just happen to have a thing about pit bulls while gun banners have a thing about guns. It's the same philosophy too. Somethings are just too dangerous for some people therefore they should be done away with.
BTW, I don't own a pitbull and I find the breed unattractive. I much prefer Danes and Mastiffs. Of course, there are some who think those breeds are too large and should also be done away with.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson