Obviously not. Is it your contention that an individual cannot harm society?
Two can play that game and it's a bore. Stupid baiting does not make effective rhetoric.
What do you know of my "style"? Presumption is the first stage of delusion.
Then you are guilty of your own tacit epithet. I made no specific inference and was talking of the correlation between religious precepts and law in general.
Why would you even bother with such a silly question?
I made no specific inference
You made this specific inference: "no matter how much it cramps your style." You made an inference that my style was being cramped. What exactly did you mean by that? I'll tell you what I believe you meant. I believe you meant that I was arguing a position based upon advantages that might accrue to me personally. That you believe me to be a fan of adultery in my personal life. Tell me what you meant by "no matter how much it cramps your style" if not that. You know nothing of me. Tell me you weren't making presumptions.