Replies

Among other things, it means I don't want laws based on people's religious views.

.. a.. what about ""THOU SHALT NOT KILL"", can't you tolerate, and that old hat ""HONOR THY FATHER AND THY MOTHER"", You did have a couple of those didn't you.. Well here is another one for you.. ""THOU SHALT NOT COMMIT ADULTERY""??..

Life isn't a quiz show my secular, libertine buddy, you can't pick the common laws of a sane society that fits your narrow view. You can't expect the rest of us to sit quietly, while you infect the rest of us with your sad and lonely, destructive lifestyle, without a fight.. well this is the fight.. .

A strong community clings to a much higher calling, one that has to keep us all together. For some, it's religion, and for others it's plain ole common decency, but for all, it has to be NORMAL, and your HOMOSEXUAL SH*T just isn't normal, if it was, practicing it wouldn't be so damned fatal?

You can lump me into that slot reserved for the far out right fringe if you wish, that is your prerogative. Lets just say I am a clear balance to you far left fringe that wants to use my grandbaby boy as a sex toy.. Do ya get my meaning, well do ya.. JERK!

A strong community clings to a much higher calling, one that has to keep us all together. For some, it's religion, and for others it's plain ole common decency, but for all, it has to be NORMAL

You can lump me into that slot reserved for the far out right fringe if you wish, that is your prerogative. Lets just say I am a clear balance to you far left fringe that wants to use my grandbaby boy as a sex toy.. Do ya get my meaning, well do ya.. JERK

PREVIOUS PHOTOS OF THE WEEK
WEEK #14: RACHEL LOERA
WEEK #14: DESIREE MCKINNEY
WEEK #14: PHOTOGRAPHER: PAUL MORGAN
WEEK #13: JESSICA HERNANDEZ
WEEK #13: LISA DEL DOTTO
WEEK #13: DEREK SOUTHERS
WEEK #12: KERRINA
WEEK #12: MICHAEL R. SORRELLS
WEEK #12: DONNA STRADER
WEEK #11: PATRICK STOLLE
WEEK #11: MALIK KIARA
WEEK #11: VALARIE POSAS
WEEK #10: BRITTANY WALSER
WEEK #10: ALEISHA FORCE
WEEK #10: BREE
WEEK #9: JOANNA
WEEK #9: TYLER FERRIS
WEEK #9: CHICKEDY
WEEK #8: KIMBERLY SARAH
WEEK #8: MARIAL BIARD
WEEK #8: SHANA KAI LANI
WEEK #7: TANNER WILSON
WEEK #7: ERIN
WEEK #7: AMY M. FRAIR
WEEK #6: ALYSSA MARTIN
WEEK #6: ISAAC MARTIN
WEEK #6: ELIZABETH BAILEY
WEEK #5: MEGAN
WEEK #5: PAM
WEEK #4: STEPHANIE
WEEK #3: KATY DUNLAP
WEEK #2: TENNILLE
WEEK #1: BRANDON LEE ROBERTO
DO YOU WANT TO BE THE "PHOTO OF THE WEEK"?
This feature on the forum has become quite popular with everyone from models and actors, to actual agents submitting their talent to be included! Those selected will be presented here for a full week on this page linked off of the MODELS & TALENT FORUM (if you submitted, it may take several weeks to actually appear here). After that, a link will remain to your feature. Each week, three individuals will be selected - photographers are welcome to submit with an example of their best work as well. Anyone can submit a photo, it does not have to be a "professional" photo. You need to send the photo via email, or send the URL link to the shot, and include your name, some general information on yourself, your location (City/State), a link to a website portfolio if you have one, and the name of your agency (if you are professionally represented). It is helpful if you can also indicate the name of the photographer who took the photo (if available and applicable), and any additional information you wish included.

Interesting homepage Carlo, but is it 'NORMAL'? Or is it trolling?

Among other things, it means I don't want laws based on people's religious views.

Does that mean that laws must avoid any congruence with religious principles? If so, let's legalize murder because the Bible forbids it.

How about a standard of practicality? Adultery is nearly always destructive to a family with children. After experiencing the consequences, the kids grow up not trusting in long term relationahips which deleteriously affects succeeding generations. That is destructive to the general good of a society.

Just because a law is collinear with a religious precept, does not mean that it is a bad thing. There is sound reason in support of adhering to such principles, no matter how much it cramps your style.

My first post to you replied to your hypocrisy at 134 about being NORMAL..

You consider your home page trolling normal, -- I don't. -- End of story.

Life isn't a quiz show my secular, libertine buddy, you can't pick the common laws of a sane society that fits your narrow view. You can't expect the rest of us to sit quietly, while you infect the rest of us with your sad and lonely, destructive lifestyle, without a fight.. well this is the fight.. .

Nor is life that which is contained in your narrow mind. You'd make a fine taliban my fanatical, control-freaking pal. Perhaps that's why can't you follow logical thought.

Me: Among other things, it means I don't want laws based on people's religious views.

You: what about ""THOU SHALT NOT KILL"", can't you tolerate

Your reply is unresponsive to my post. The Bible is far from the sole prohibiter of murder. The appeal of the prohibition of murder and theft extend beyond any religion and that is why they are good laws. Even in the godless Soviet Union you couldn't commit murder.

P.S. Do you consider the initiation of gratitous, ignorant, libelous name-calling one of your better qualities?

and that old hat ""HONOR THY FATHER AND THY MOTHER"",

Do you propose we make a law enforcing honor?