[milan]

Others see it rather as a book which is a witness to God's message, but one which was written by humans and thus has flaws.

And how do we know that the portions of the Bible which discuss homesexuality are NOT flawed? Maybe the PC view is thawed...maybe? It is.

God said to be "fruitful and multiply" How do two men do that?

God said "a man will leave his mother and father" to be with his wife...not his gay partner.

This article is nuts. There is not two views. There is a correct view and a wrong view. The "gay" view is wrong. No grey area. Gays can justify their conduct as much as they want, and I hope it makes them feel good. They are wrong.

[jocon307]

"This article is nuts."

I thought the article was pretty good, actually. It lays out the two sides of the argument and doesn't champion either. I am not familiar with the Bible "chapter & verse" and have oftened wondered where the homsexual activists found support.

Now I can clearly see from the quotations here that their platform rests on some pretty flimsy boards.

I also see I better stop drinking, if you know what I mean. So I will say, good post!

[MEG33]

Why don't we discuss fornicators,slanderers,thieves,adulterers,like we do homosexuals?