Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RedBloodedAmerican
I would disagree with the article. I guess mainly from the fact I had a family member die at OHSU of cancer and the cause was second hand smoke.

The cause was cancer, period.

This whole notion that cancer is caused by environmental factors is very thin science except in the case of radiation poisoning and massive doses of strong carcinogens such as that observable in laboratory animals.

Most of the rest is due to advancing age, hormonal changes and predisposition.

52 posted on 10/17/2003 10:51:23 AM PDT by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Old Professer
Smokers die,as they all do,and it's considered a smoking related death.

Non smokers die,as they all do,and it's what?????? A non-smoking related death?

How ridiculous the whole anti-smoking thing is.Non smokers don't like the smell of cigarettes,no problem with that,but to make it the worst health scourge of the last 50 years is a bit much.


59 posted on 10/17/2003 11:02:03 AM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson