Free Republic
Browse · Search
VetsCoR
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The FReeper Foxhole Studies - The Browning .50 caliber Machine Gun "MA DEUCE" - Aug. 29th, 2003

Posted on 08/29/2003 4:55:59 AM PDT by snippy_about_it

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last
To: Prof Engineer
Also a cure for road rage

If I had one of those they roads would be a lot less crowded here.

41 posted on 08/29/2003 8:18:56 AM PDT by SAMWolf (I'm So miserable Without You, It's Like Having You Here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: w_over_w
I remember the pics from "Operation Iraqi Freedom" when our soldiers on entering Baghdad opened up on an approaching SUV.

Yep those scenes of that armoured column driving through Baghdad taking out any vehicles that came close were fascinating.

42 posted on 08/29/2003 8:20:33 AM PDT by SAMWolf (I'm So miserable Without You, It's Like Having You Here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
Were our Armored Cruiser designs the same idea behind the British Battle Cruisers and the German Pocket Battleships?

Armored cruisers could be considered the first step to the battle cruiser. In theory, they were both designed to do the same job: scout for the fleet, destroy enemy cruisers, and operate independently of the battle fleet. Armored cruisers were larger and faster than battleships, but more lightly armed and armored. The larger size came from having larger engines for more speed. Battle cruisers were larger and faster than battleships, had the same armament as battleships, but were lightly armored. Battle cruisers were susposed to be used just like the armored cruisers, however, with those big guns Admirals just couldn't resist putting them in the battle line along side the battleships. The results were disasterous for the battle cruisers. Britian lost three in one day at Jutland during WWI, and in WWII the Bismark finished off the Hood in only 5 minutes .

The German pocket battleships were officially called Armored Ships by the Germans and were designed mainly to be commerce destroyers.

43 posted on 08/29/2003 8:28:31 AM PDT by aomagrat (IYAOYAS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: *all

Air Power
North American OV-10 "Bronco"

The OV-10 Bronco was a multi-purpose, light attack aircraft acquired by the Marine Corp for observation squadrons to conduct visual reconnaissance missions. The OV-10A is a twin-turboprop short takeoff and landing aircraft conceived by the Marine Corps and developed under an Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps tri-service program.

In October 1964, the Navy awarded a contract to North American to design a Light Armed Reconnaissance Aircraft (LARA) for the Marine Corps. Two years later, the LARA had developed into a tri-service program to provide a Counter-Insurgency (COIN) aircraft for the United States Armed Forces. The first production OV-10A was ordered in 1966 and its initial flight took place in August 1967. HML-267 accepted the first article for the Marine Corps in February 1968. A total of 356 Broncos were accepted for Navy and Marine Corps use and for foreign military sales.

The OV-10 can be used for short take-offs and landings on aircraft carriers without the use of catapults. With the second seat removed, it can carry 3,200 pounds of cargo, five paratroopers or two litter patients and an attendant. Adding to its versatility is a rear fuselage compartment with a capacity of 3,200 pounds of cargo, five combat-equipped troops, or two litter patients and a medical attendant.

The Bronco's mission capabilities include observation, forward air control, helicopter escort, armed reconnaissance, gunfire spotting, utility and limited ground attack; however, the USAF acquired the Bronco primarily as a forward air control (FAC) aircraft. The Bronco also provides transportation for aerial radiological reconnaissance, tactical air observers, artillery and naval gunfire spotting and airborne controllers of tactical air support operations. Other tasks include armed escort for helicopters and front line, low-level aerial photography.

The first USAF OV-10As destined for combat arrived in Vietnam on July 31, 1968. A total of 157 OV-10As were delivered to the USAF before production ended in April 1969.

The OV-10 Night Observation Gunship (NOGS) was a USMC OV-10A modified to include a turreted FLIR sensor and turreted M-197 20-mm gun slaved to the FLIR aimpoint. Successful in combat in Vietnam, NOGS evolved into the NOS OV-10D, which included a laser designator.

The OV-10D was the result of an improvement program to produce what was referred to as the OV-10D Plus configuration. Begun in 1988, the -10D included the Service Life Extension Program, which comprised a wide range of engineering change proposals to update the aircraft and improve its performance. Some structural changes were made and avionics equipment was added. The aircraft was night vision capable.

Each of the Marine Corps' two observation squadrons had 18 aircraft, 9 OV-10As and 9 OV-10Ds night observation aircraft. There was also a Marine Air Reserve squadron. The OV-10 was phased out of the Marine Corps in 1995.

Although the United States no longer flies the OV-10, other countries continue to operate the Bronco.

Specifications:
Contractor: North American (some say Grumman too)
Primary Function: Multi-Role support Aircraft
Power Plant: Two 715-shp Garrett Air Research turboprops
Crew: Two

Dimensions:
Wing Span: 40 ft 4 in
Wing Area: 291 sq ft
Length: 41 ft 6 in
Height: 15 ft 1 in
Maximum Takeoff Weight: 14,444 lbs
Empty Weight: 6,921 lbs

Performance :
Max Speed: 281 mph
Cruising speed: 223 mph.
Range: 1,240 miles
Service Ceiling: 26,000 ft.

Armaments:
Four 7.62-mm guns, or 4 x 0.50 cal machine guns
And 3,600 lbs. of mixed ordnance consisting of:
AIM-9 Side-winders, rockets, bombs, external gun pods.




All photos Copyright of Global Security.Org

44 posted on 08/29/2003 8:29:34 AM PDT by Johnny Gage (If you try to fail, and succeed ....... Which have you done?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: w_over_w
I have a quite a few pictures saved from OIF, though most of the weapons you see are SAW's and M-60's, only a few Ma Deuces. What the heck, they all look good so I'll share a few just because! Maybe one day I'll do a photo essay on OIF just so I can post all my pictures.







45 posted on 08/29/2003 8:30:53 AM PDT by snippy_about_it (Pray for our troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Johnny Gage
Looks like you had fun! Hey, where are those Yosemite pictures? Hmmmm?
46 posted on 08/29/2003 8:33:31 AM PDT by snippy_about_it (Pray for our troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Johnny Gage
Thanks Johnny. I believe I posted some "Broncos" on the ARS/CholeraJoe thread. Interesting looking plane.
47 posted on 08/29/2003 8:36:37 AM PDT by snippy_about_it (Pray for our troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: snippy_about_it
Thanks Snip . . . just awesome!
48 posted on 08/29/2003 8:36:55 AM PDT by w_over_w (Only those who risk going too far will ever know how far they can go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: radu; snippy_about_it; LaDivaLoca; TEXOKIE; cherry_bomb88; Bethbg79; Do the Dew; Pippin; ...
Our Military Today
President Bush is a Real Doll


A miniature replica of U.S. President George W. Bush attired in the naval aviator flight uniform, depicting what he wore when he landed on the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln to declare an end to major combat in Iraq, is displayed in Hong Kong August 29, 2003 next to an earlier letter from Bush. A Hong Kong toy company has shipped about 35,000 pieces of such one-to-six scale dolls to the U.S. and other countries











49 posted on 08/29/2003 8:48:13 AM PDT by SAMWolf (I'm So miserable Without You, It's Like Having You Here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: aomagrat
Thanks aomagrat. I figured the theory behind the Armoured Cruiser and the Battle Cruiser was pretty much the same.

Battle Cruisers at Jutland

"There seems to be something wrong with our bloody ships today..." remarked Admiral David Beatty to his Flag Captain. Beatty was commander of the Battle Cruiser Fleet at Jutland, and his cool comment belied the scale of the catastrophe. It was 4.26 pm on May 31, 1916 and from the upper bridge of the battle-cruiser Lion he had just seen her sister ship, Queen Mary, disappear in a shattering blast as both main magazines exploded. Twenty minutes earlier another battle-cruiser, the Indefatigable, had vanished in a sheet of smoke and flame and, although Beatty did not know it at the time, the Lion herself had narrowly missed a similar fate only by flooding her Q turret magazine with sea water.

At the Battle of Jutland, the greatest sea battle of all time, the British Navy would lose three battle-cruisers carrying over three thousand men in less than three hours. It was not bad luck, it was bad management: the result of the Navy's inability to manage a complex system from design through to execution. For the roots of the disaster lay in the design of the ships over a decade earlier. Thus the problem was systemic and Beatty's puzzled comment represents one of the more dramatic instances of the bewildered reaction of a CEO to symptoms of systemic problems in the field.

Battle-cruisers like the Lion were the pride of the Navy. Known affectionately as the "big cats", they were armed almost as heavily as battleships and could reach speeds of over 27 knots. In the pursuit of speed and firepower, however, protection had to suffer and the battle-cruisers had only thinly-armoured decks. Their speed, their designers thought, would keep them out of trouble. Their thin armour and emphasis on speed created an aura of risk-taking and, not unlike our modern day astronauts, the sailors who served on them enjoyed high status.

The compromises designed into the battle-cruisers were compounded by modifications made to them to accommodate the Navy's peacetime gunnery practices. Managers usually try to optimize the variables that they can measure most easily, and the Navy was no exception. They had developed a cult of rapid fire, for rate of fire was easily measured and as a "benchmark" it allowed intense gunnery competition among all ships and squadrons in the fleet. In their efforts to feed the guns with charges from the magazines, however, gun crews began to eliminate the anti-flash baffles that slowed the process. At first they left the flash doors open but over time, as word spread about the performance benefits of the practice, some were removed completely. Protection is hard to test in peacetime and no one realized that the battle-cruisers were now dangerously vulnerable. If a shell were to penetrate the main turret armour, the resulting explosion was likely to flash down the ammunition hoist to the main cordite stores in the magazines below.

The third systemic factor which sealed the fate of the battle-cruisers at Jutland was the way they were deployed. If speed was critical and deck armour thin, then the battle-cruisers would do best in high-speed encounters at relatively close range, where the flat trajectory of enemy fire would encounter their thicker side armour. This was not to be the case. It had been a century since the British Navy had fought its last major sea battle at Trafalgar and Nelsonian initiative was not common among the senior officers. The technology of naval warfare had changed enormously and was largely untested in combat. There was horror of losing a ship and this conservatism was abetted by the recent introduction of the wireless and the organizational centralization that accompanied it. As a result, the battle-cruisers were held in a long range gunnery duel in line of battle, where their speed was of little help and their decks were exposed to plunging projectiles fired on high trajectories. On May 31, 1916 the systems loop had closed and disaster was at hand. Perversely, in their efforts to preserve the battle-cruisers from destruction, their commanders had actually made them more vulnerable to catastrophe.

50 posted on 08/29/2003 8:54:49 AM PDT by SAMWolf (I'm So miserable Without You, It's Like Having You Here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Johnny Gage
Thakns Johnny. I believe that OV-10 was still used by the Marines in Desert Storm.




51 posted on 08/29/2003 9:06:53 AM PDT by SAMWolf (I'm So miserable Without You, It's Like Having You Here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
Hey!

G.I. George!

KEWL!!!!

52 posted on 08/29/2003 9:22:52 AM PDT by Pippin (Bush/Cheney in '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: snippy_about_it; *all
Go here for the "first half" of the trip.

"JG's" Family Vacation

I've been far too busy to get the 2nd half completed.

I should be able to get them done after Labor Day.

53 posted on 08/29/2003 9:39:37 AM PDT by Johnny Gage (We will not tire, We will not falter, We will not fail. George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Valin
Murphys Law of the day...
If everything seems to be going well, you have obviously overlooked something.

The story of my life....

GLOOM, DESPAIR AND AGONY ON ME....

54 posted on 08/29/2003 9:42:26 AM PDT by Samwise (There are other forces at work in this world, Frodo, besides the will of evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
The .50 is sure fun to fire. I liked to fire it on the ground mount - talk about rockin' and rollin'!

Back in the post-Vietnam Army I had my armorer take out the ground mounted .50 cal for some familiarization fire. I found out just too late the guy didn't have a clue you had to set the head space and timing and apparently had never been taught the skill. So, not even the M-2 is completely soldier proof.

55 posted on 08/29/2003 10:34:22 AM PDT by colorado tanker (Iron Horse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Pippin
Hiya Pippin.

Sure beats the hell out of the "Bill clinton dropping trousers doll"
56 posted on 08/29/2003 11:25:51 AM PDT by SAMWolf (I'm So miserable Without You, It's Like Having You Here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Johnny Gage
Hey, who stole all the trees arounfd there? I drove through the Badlands on the ay to Oregon. Desolate area, yet it had a beauty to it.
57 posted on 08/29/2003 11:27:24 AM PDT by SAMWolf (I'm So miserable Without You, It's Like Having You Here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
LOL! I don't think the Goverenment has ever made a piece of equipment that's Soldier Proof
58 posted on 08/29/2003 11:28:42 AM PDT by SAMWolf (I'm So miserable Without You, It's Like Having You Here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: snippy_about_it; All


Audie Murphy used a Ma Deuce in earning his Medal of Honor

Second Lieutenant Audie L. Murphy, 01692509, 15th Infantry, Army of the United States, on 26 January 1945, near Holtzwihr, France, commanded Company B, which was attacked by six tanks and waves of infantry. Lieutenant Murphy ordered his men to withdraw to a prepared position in a woods while he remained forward at his command post and continued to give fire directions to the artillery by telephone. Behind him to his right one of our tank destroyers received a direct hit and began to burn. It's crew withdrew to the woods.

Lieutenant Murphy continued to direct artillery fire which killed large numbers of the advancing enemy infantry. With the enemy tanks abreast of his position, Lieutenant Murphy climbed on the burning tank destroyer which was in danger of blowing up any instant and employed its .50 caliber machine gun against the enemy. He was alone and exposed to the German fire from three sides, but his deadly fire killed dozens of Germans and caused their infantry attack to waver. The enemy tanks, losing infantry support, began to fall back. For an hour the Germans tried every available weapon to eliminated Lieutenant Murphy, but he continued to hold his position and wiped out a squad which was trying to creep up unnoticed on his right flank. Germans reached as close as 10 yards only to be mowed down by his fire. He received a leg wound but ignored it and continued the single-handed fight until his ammunition was exhausted. He then made his way to his company, refused medical attention, and organized the company in a counterattack which forced the Germans to withdraw.

His directing of artillery fire wiped out many of the enemy; he personally killed or wounded about 50. Lieutenant Murphy's indomitable courage and his refusal to give an inch of ground saved his company from possible encirclement and destruction and enabled it to hold the woods which had been the enemy's objective.

59 posted on 08/29/2003 11:34:53 AM PDT by SAMWolf (I'm So miserable Without You, It's Like Having You Here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Johnny Gage
Johnny those are great! The Badlands are beautiful. Mount Rushmore looks smaller than I imagined.

Thanks.
60 posted on 08/29/2003 12:41:00 PM PDT by snippy_about_it (Pray for our troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
VetsCoR
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson