Was researching ship camo patterns earlier today,
USS Baltimore is an item of debate as per her camo pattern at www.shipcamouflage.com
Posted by George Cost on 15:37:31 9/21/2001 from 205.188.198.178:
In reply to: Re: CA-68 posted by John Sheridan on 15:10:20 9/21/2001 from 208.204.155.241:
John,
I thought that Ms33 was the low contrast scheme, with just Light and Haze Gray. Thats what I've got on my USS San Francisco and USS Reno. I wasn't aware that Ms33 had this varient,
George
: : Thanks for the input. Now I'm really confused.
: : Squadrons new book, for all its faults, has a picture of C A68(you can read the hull# on then bow)in what they call
Ms 32/16d.
The reference on this web site list her as Ms 33 /16d , but Ms 33 was the low contrast Measure, eliminating b la color.
I'm thinking there is a typo on the ship camo reference. Which still doesn't bring me any closer to the deck p at tern!
: I orignally had CA-68 in MS 32/16d but after talking to John Snyder and Don Pruel, we determined that the colors carried by CA-68 were Light Gray 5-L, Haze Gray 5-H, and Navy Blue 5-N which would make it a MS-33 pattern and not MS-32.
As for Commanders and their MS-31 pattern....NO WAY!
John Sheridan
www.shipcamouflage.com
**For those reading along..the first number is the color pallete..the second is the design.
USS Isherwood DD 520 Aug/1944 Measure 31/16d
USS Drayton recieved the nickname.."The Blue Beetle" from her paint job.
The attachment stuck...as Draytons fleet call sign became Blue Beetle.
There's a few stories on Drayton as to her color..that she needed to go out from yard availability quickly..so they painted her all blue.
Some comment it was an experiment by Navy dept.
Maybe aomagrat has the answer in his library : )