Free Republic
Browse · Search
VetsCoR
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Military Organization Question (Vanity)
None ^ | 3/18/03 | RonF

Posted on 03/18/2003 6:53:22 AM PST by RonF

I've been following the blog on this link. Not being a veteran, I was confused by one piece of military lingo: "CO" and "XO". I do know enough to know that CO = Commanding Officer and XO = Executive Officer. Past that I'm hazy. I am under the impression that an XO is the "second in command" of a military unit. Is that correct? What are the duties of an XO? Sorry for making a post out of this, but I didn't know where else to go for the answer.


TOPICS: VetsCoR
KEYWORDS: help

1 posted on 03/18/2003 6:53:22 AM PST by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RonF
Sorry, I goofed on the posting. The link is www.lt-smash.com
2 posted on 03/18/2003 6:56:15 AM PST by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RonF
The XO is there to take over for the CO but in a small unit he is usually responsible for the administration/paper work in the unit. This is because the CO is commanding the troops and usually to lazy to do it. In a large unit, there is a staff. You may have an operations officer, supply officer, security officer, etc. Once again it falls to the XO to organize and co-ordinate the staff. This is because the CO is busy commanding the troops and is usually to lazy to do it. Being an XO sucks because, he usually has to do all the not so fun work and has none of the glory of being the CO. However, if the XO screws up or a staff member screws up which causes the unit to screw up, the CO usually gets all the blame. When this happens, it is not so bad being the XO after all.
3 posted on 03/18/2003 3:50:37 PM PST by U S Army EOD (Served in Korea, Vietnam and still fighting America's enemies on Home Front)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RonF
Best way to find out is to join up.

Think you can pass a Backgroud Investigation (BI)?

4 posted on 03/18/2003 6:05:45 PM PST by battlegearboat (Reinstate the Draft!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: battlegearboat
Backgroud=Background
5 posted on 03/18/2003 6:06:27 PM PST by battlegearboat (Reinstate the Draft!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RonF
CO = Commanding Officer
XO = Executive Officer
6 posted on 03/18/2003 6:09:09 PM PST by Michael121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: battlegearboat
A background investigation I can pass. However, I'm 50 years old and right now my service consists of being a Scoutmaster.
7 posted on 03/19/2003 2:45:36 PM PST by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RonF
I have a question of my own. The news refers to "82 Airborne" or "101 Infantry". Where are airborne units 1-82 and Infantry units 1-100? Why send the 82nd before the 1st?
8 posted on 03/27/2003 11:04:22 AM PST by LetsRok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LetsRok
I don't know. My guess is that during WW II, there was an expansion of the armed forces so that 1-81 and 1 - 99 existed. Once the war was over and the armed forces were downsized, certain units that had distinguished themselves were retained, and the others were dissolved/absorbed. But that's a sheer guess on my part.
9 posted on 03/27/2003 12:07:55 PM PST by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
VetsCoR
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson