Free Republic
Browse · Search
VetsCoR
Topics · Post Article

To: SAMWolf

Looks like Rumsfeld took some flak from combat troops while in Kuwait about inadequately armored vehicles. Perhaps you recollect I have been talking about this very problem since before the invasion.

No reason for command detonated mines to seriously injure a soldier riding in a standard sort of mine resistant vehicle. Even the Israeli RAM would give ten, twenty times less injury compared to a HMMV.

http://www.israeli-weapons.com/weapons/vehicles/light_combat_vehicles/ram/Ram.html

Too many photos to post. Same website I posted earlier, a page on this class of vehicle. Machine is armored only where the weight will protect the crew. The running gear, engine, and transmission are designed to protect the armored crew compartment by absorbing the explosion. Engine is an air cooled Deutz.


10 posted on 12/09/2004 2:07:24 AM PST by Iris7 (.....to protect the Constitution from all enemies, both foreign and domestic. Same bunch, anyway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Iris7

Interesting vehicle. Israel has had a lot more experience in urban combat, looks like they've put it to good use.

IMHO, the HMMV is being misused, it wasn't designed for the role we've given it in Irag.


35 posted on 12/09/2004 11:21:25 AM PST by SAMWolf (I was on a roll, 'till I slipped on the butter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
VetsCoR
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson