Posted on 06/29/2004 12:00:34 AM PDT by SAMWolf
|
are acknowledged, affirmed and commemorated.
|
Our Mission: The FReeper Foxhole is dedicated to Veterans of our Nation's military forces and to others who are affected in their relationships with Veterans. In the FReeper Foxhole, Veterans or their family members should feel free to address their specific circumstances or whatever issues concern them in an atmosphere of peace, understanding, brotherhood and support. The FReeper Foxhole hopes to share with it's readers an open forum where we can learn about and discuss military history, military news and other topics of concern or interest to our readers be they Veteran's, Current Duty or anyone interested in what we have to offer. If the Foxhole makes someone appreciate, even a little, what others have sacrificed for us, then it has accomplished one of it's missions. We hope the Foxhole in some small way helps us to remember and honor those who came before us.
|
Conception, Construction and Combat The Renault FT tank was a brainchild of Gen. Jean-Baptiste Estienne who approached French industrialist, Louis Renault, in July 1916 with the idea of building a light, small, and inexpensive tank. Renault had not participated in the tank program previously, citing the overwhelming workload of his company, but the idea of building an entirely new tank captured his attention. The challenge was accepted and in October 1916 a wooden mock-up of the tank was presented to Gen. Estienne. It was the beginning of a long fight. The Renault FT prototype, cast turret. Gen. Estienne could not convince the Director of Motor Services, Gen. Mourret, to allocate funds and authorize a pilot program. Consequently, he appealed to the Commander-in-Chief, Gen. Joffre, for support. After a dispute with the Under-Secretary of State for War, Albert Thomas, the production of a single prototype was authorized. Louis Renault did not wait for formal permission, and started construction of a prototype immediately after completion of the work on an improved wooden mock-up. Char Mitrailleur, as the tank was named, was presented for the first time in January 1917. It successfully completed tests in the Billancourt factory in February, 1917 and in April, 1917 in the Centre Artillerie Speciale at Champlieu. The first production order for 100 tanks was placed after approval of the Comite Consultatif de l'Artillerie Speciale in December 1916. The order was expanded from 150 tanks in February 1917, to 1000 in April 1917, and to 3500 in June 1917. By October 1918, total orders in French factories for all types of Renault tanks reached an unprecedented number of 7820. Production was extended to other factories, which by the end of the war, built 3530 tanks of which 3177 Renault FT was accepted by the Ministry of Armament. The breakdown of the factory production was as follows: Renault 1850, Berliet 800, SOMUA 600, and Delaunay-Belleville 280. The Renault FT with 37mm cannon with a Berliet turret. Production of the Renault FT created numerous technical challenges for the French industry. Armor plate was imported from England, and Renault was forced to reject 40% of it because many shipments did not adhere to specifications. There was a shortage of 37 mm Puteaux guns, tank engines, and skilled work force. Some problems, like breaking fan belts and poor quality fuel filters, were not corrected until the end of the war. Many front units were incapacitated by the scarcity of spare parts and poor workmanship. The number of mechanical breakdowns was in general higher than loses due to enemy activity. The Renault FT 75BS (Blockhouse Schneider) with a 75mm Howitzer and a stationary turret. Renault continued production after the war manufacturing an additional 570 tanks which became the backbone of the French armament export. Renault FT tanks were sold to Belgium, Brazil, Czechoslovakia, Estonia, Finland, Holland, Lithuania, Latvia, Poland, Switzerland, Sweden and Yugoslavia. An Allied tank at the battle of St. Mihiel, France, 1918. The Renault FT was the first tank with a full traverse 360o rotating turret. It had a modern, still used, configuration of main elements: driver in the front, engine in the rear and armament in a fully traversable turret in the center. The basic form was an armored box narrow in the front, wider in the center, and narrowing to the rear. The running gear was flexibly attached to the hull, unlike the earlier French and British tanks which had chassis. The running assembly was mounted on a heavy longitudinal girder carried on leaf springs. The rail carrying supporting rollers was attached on a pivot in the rear and tensioned on a coiled spring at the front. This construction allowed for more comfortable running over rough terrain. A big idler wheel in the front, projecting forward from the tank, permitted it to cross vertical obstacles and climb steep slopes. The adjustable idler also served to put tension on the tracks preventing them from slipping. The driving sprocket was placed at the rear of the vehicle. Steering was performed through a simple declutching and breaking the transmission to the tracks on either side. A tail was fitted to the rear of the tank to increase its length and improve trench crossing capability. The crew consisted of two soldiers, driver up front and gunner in the turret. The driver entered the tank through the double door in the front which formed the decking, while the gunner through the hatch at the rear of the turret. The driver would sit on a canvas seat on the floor in the front and his view of the battlefield was provided for by three slots and an opening shutter. The gunner had a canvas belt, serving as a seat, attached to the sides of the manually operated turret. The turret was surmounted by a mushroom shaped dome on a small rim with five observation slits. The Renault FT at the service of the American Army in France, 1918. In addition to the two main models of the Renault FT (37 mm gun and 8 mm machine gun) two other models were conceived and put in to production. Char Signal TSF was a radio tank version of the Renault FT equipped with an E 10 ter radio. This variant had no armament which was replaced by the long observation slit in the front of a box-like turret. The crew consisted of driver, radio operator and observer. The wire antenna was extended between the turret top and tail. The other model was the Char FT 75 BS, armed with the 75 mm Blockhouse Schneider "petoire" howitzer. The gun was placed in an extended turret with the gunners hatch moved to the left. Ammunition was reduced to 30 rounds due to the increased caliber of the gun. Renault tanks were grouped into 9 regiments, numbered 501 - 509, which consisted of 3 battalions each. Every battalion contained 3 tank companies and numbered 75 tanks with mixed armament when at full strength. Each company had a headquarter with 1 tank (Renault FT 37 mm), three platoons with 5 tanks each, a reserve with 5 replacement tanks and a recovery platoon with 3 tanks. The remaining 3 tanks were kept in reserve at battalion's headquarters. Organization tables quickly became untenable during the combat due to high levels of attrition. Number of mechanical defects and ditching were by far the main causes of tank losses. Enemy action accounted for a relatively small number of tanks eliminated in combat. The 501st Tank Regiment was the first Renault FT unit committed to action. Renaults were used on the 31st of May 1918 in the support of Gen. Mangin's 10th Army, in order to slow German progress toward Paris. The engagement took place in the Foret de Retz, south-west of Soissons. Three battalions were used piecemeal in the support of Moroccan infantry, in a series of local counterattacks which were sometimes executed in the forest itself. Renault tanks proved their battle worthiness from the start, leading infantry in the attack and stiffening it's resolve in defense. Thanks to the small size of the tank they could enter forested areas, where larger British Mark V or French St. Chamond and Schneider were useless. Lt. Col. Patton with FT-17 Renault Tank The main task of tank units was to eliminate machine gun nests and destroy barbed-wire obstacles, enabling infantry to cross no-man's-land. The principal advantages of the Renault tanks were their small size, agility on the battlefield, and large numbers. French troops praised their support by the light tanks and demanded it in every operation. Although tank - infantry cooperation was poor due to lack of training, nevertheless, infantry units always requested the support of the tanks in every offensive operation. Renault FTs were used in combat from the 31st of May to the 11th of November, 1918, taking part in 4356 engagements, losing only 746 (17%), of them. Field guns were the main threat to the tanks, accounting for 356 totally destroyed Renaults, of 440 lost during the war. The other threats were: mines, tank traps, and the Mauser antitank rifles. Antitank trenches, shell holes and wide infantry trenches temporarily put more tanks out of action than direct engagement with the enemy. At the end of the war the French army fielded 1991 Renault tanks in line units and another 386 in workshops.
|
An order of the Polish Army in France issued on March 15, 1919 formed the 1st Polish Tank Regiment (1er Regiment des Char Blindes Polonais) and this date is regarded as the beginning of the Polish Armored Forces. The 1st Tank Regiment was formed on the base of the French 505th Tank Regiment (505 Regiment des Char Blindes) with mixed Franco - Polish cadres. Major Joules Mare, commander of the 505th Regiment, also became a commander of the Polish unit. Formation of the 1st Regiment began in Martigny-les-Bains in department of Vosges on March 22nd, 1919. On March 28th the first volunteers started to arrive. The enlisted men originated from Polish nationals, POWs from German and Austro-Hungarian armies, and also from Polish American and French volunteers.
The 1st Regiment was transported by train to Lodz in Poland between June 1st and June 16th, 1919. On the day of departure from France, the 1st Regiment numbered 34 officers and 354 other ranks of French and 11 officers with 442 other ranks of Polish. The process of gradual taking over the unit by the Poles began in October 1919.
During the spring of 1920 the southern wing of the Polish Army advanced deep into Ukraine and captured Kiev. Operation was undertaken in the hope of establishing a friendly, independent Ukrainian state on the eastern border of Poland. The 1st Tank Regiment units were kept in reserve during this drive. In May of 1920, the 1st Tank Battalion (1st and 2nd Companies) was stationed in Wilno (Vilno) and 2nd Tank Battalion (3rd and 4th Companies) in Kiev. Stationed in Kiev 3rd Company was employed for reconnaissance and patrol duties on the eastern bank of the Dnieper river. Red Army launched their counter-offensive in the Ukraine in May breaking through Polish defenses after a bitter five day battle. Budienny's 1st Cavalry Army, operating behind Polish lines after penetration of the front, precipitated Polish retreat from Kiev and Ukraine. The 2nd Tank Battalion got a dangerous task of acting as a rear guard to cover retreating infantry units and civilians fleeing the Bolsheviks.
The 4th Company was used to strengthen the defenses around the town of Rowno. The detached II platoon, lead by Lt. Bronislaw Rafalski, covered the retreat of the 3rd Infantry Division on the road Korzec - Rowno. Fighting for Rowno lasted all day on July 5th until dusk when the general retreat order was issued. Tanks again were ordered to cover the evacuation. Fighting in the surrounding fields continued into the night. The 4th Company retreated without orders to an already abandoned railway station and loaded their tanks on flatcars. Although most of the tanks of the 4th Company were damaged, only one was lost during the fighting in Rowno.
The 1st Tank Battalion, stationed in Wilno (Vilno) in the northern part of the front, was engulfed by July 4th, 1920 Tukhachevsky's offensive. It was moved by rail to Grodno where the 2nd Company entered the garrison of the city and the 1st Company remained on the flatcars. On July 19th, Grodno was attacked by the III Cavalry Corps led by Ghai-Khan and weak Polish forces were soon overwhelmed. Gen. Mokrzecki, commanding the defense of Grodno, gave the order to the 2nd Company to counterattack.
www.chars-francais.net
www.geocities.com/hallersarmy
www.army.lt/armor
mailer.fsu.edu
www.geocities.com/pibw
members.lycos.co.uk
www.americaslibrary.gov
www.worldwar1.com
Between 1923 and 1930, most of the activities of the Poles in the tank development field were concentrated on continuous attempts to improve the Renault FT tank. One of the first stages in this direction was by substituting a new design of laterally flexible tracks - designed by S. Kardaszewicz - which were composed of twelve steel cables fitted with steel grousers. Although the speed was increased to 12km/h (7.5mph), the Kardaszewicz tracks were not accepted and a similar rejection occurred to another design introduced by an officer of the 1st Tank Regiment. However, another track design by S. Kardaszewicz was accepted. This design used the more "classic" style of tracks as we know them today. The main appearance difference in his design was that the tracks had smaller links. This track reengineering allowed the tank to achieve speeds of 12/13km/h plus giving the machine a better ride. Some 65 tanks received this upgrade between 1925 and 1926. Another upgrade experiment was the decision to update the Renault FT armament by fitting it with a newly designed turret carrying both a 37mm gun and a coaxial 7.92mm Browning machine-gun. Only 6 of these turrets were made. Some other redesigns were to increase the performance to 13kmh. A small number of Renault FT tanks were rebuilt into specialized variants including a smoke producing tank and 6 radio command tanks (TSF). |
Who They Are: Operation: Stitches Of Love was started by the Mothers of two United States Marines stationed in Iraq.
What They Are Doing: We are gathering 12.5"x12.5" quilt squares from across the country and assembling the largest quilt ever produced. When completed we will take the quilt from state to state and gather even more squares.
Why They Are Doing This: We are building this quilt to rally support for the Coalition Forces in Iraq and to show the service members that they are not forgotten. We want the world to know Nothing will ever break the stitches that bind us together as a country.
Ideas to start a local project:
Obtain enough Red, White and Blue material (cloth) for a 12.5 x 12.5 quilt square.
If you have someone in your family that sews, make it a weekend project and invite neighbors to join you.
Consider this tribute as a project for your civic group, scouts, church or townhall group.
Locate an elementary school with an after school program in your neighborhood or locate an after school program in your neighborhood not attached to a school and ask if you could volunteer one or two afternoons and create some squares with the kids.
Invite some VFW posts to share your project in honor of their post.
Send us webmaster@patriotwatch.com for digital photos of in progress and finished project for various websites, OIFII.com and the media.
PDN is making this appeal in support of Operation: Stitches Of Love
Media Contact: Deborah Johns (916) 716-2749
Volunteers & Alternate Media: PDN (916) 448-1636
Your friends at PDN
No comment : )
Morning Light Speed.
AHHHH! One of my favorite Panther pics. It's just sooooo french.
No comment needed with that pic. Goodnight Light Speed.
Some rise to the challenge of their foe and overcome...
others....they go to the Bistro.
Goodmorning/Goodnight Sam : )
The French can fight. Every generation, though, fewer Frenchmen are fighting men, it seems. Nowadays there aren't very many. Bravery, honor, and willingness to fight when needed are Aristocratic virtues, and in decay in this era of the (very) common man.
I figure Democracy in France brought Socialism with the result that virtue and morale steadily decayed. One hopes this will not happen here.
Not the first time the Poles have saved the West, that is for sure.
ping
To all our military men and women, past and present, and to our allies who stand with us, |
ping
We're under a Flash Flood Watch. depending on the weather, we may be unplugging the computer from time to time.
HVAP Treadhead Tuesday Foxhole Bump
Regards
alfa6 ;>}
somewhat off-topic question...maybe you or anyone on your list has the answer.. I'm looking for any serious monograph or article about the effect of Turkey's refusal to allow the US forces to come south into Iraq, on the course of the war, casualties, etc.. I'm sure the Pentagon has already done some studies..have any been released?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.