To: snippy_about_it
Flying the Ploesti mission was rough. The one half losses is about expectable. The Liberators of 1943 burned up pretty badly as I recall, also. Very slow, as was the B-17. Navigation would be tough, especially in daylight, without meticulous reconnaissance photography. Only navigation aid was probably high frequency radio direction finding - HF DF - "Huff Duff".
The Pratt Twin Wasp used in the Liberator is a major milestone on the radial aircraft engine road. Very good engine, reliable. Not as powerful as really needed for the war, though.
The Pratt R-2800 was the star of the World War aero engines with over 2,000 horsepower. The R-4360, a post war development, ah, now that was an engine. Turbo compounded about 3,800 horse power.
Seriously, if it was my responsibility to specify engines for a new work, as opposed to toy, aircraft, I would of course use modern turbine engines. The Pratt PT-6 series will do anything any WWII radial can do with much greater reliability, lower cost, and weight. Radials are as obsolete as reciprocating steam engines. And the PT-6 is truly beautifully made, like all of the Pratt stuff.
18 posted on
05/15/2004 7:40:59 AM PDT by
Iris7
(If "Iris7" upsets or intrigues you, see my Freeper home page for a nice explanatory essay.)
To: Iris7
Morning Iris7.
The Pratt PT-6 series will do anything any WWII radial can do with much greater reliability, lower cost, and weight. Radials are as obsolete as reciprocating steam engines.
But, but, but!! Nothing sounds like a Radial engine. Watched a show on the P-51 last night. Hearing those bomber fleets sends a chill down my spine.
26 posted on
05/15/2004 8:47:54 AM PDT by
SAMWolf
(Vengence is mine says the Lord, but I'm busy, so I sent the US Marines.)
To: Iris7
Thanks Iris7. I learn more and more everyday from your posts.
42 posted on
05/15/2004 11:41:15 AM PDT by
snippy_about_it
(Fall in --> The FReeper Foxhole. America's History. America's Soul.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson