Free Republic
Browse · Search
VetsCoR
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The FReeper Foxhole Profiles the LST -- Landing Ships, Tank - April 9th, 2004
see educational sources

Posted on 04/09/2004 5:23:25 AM PDT by snippy_about_it



Lord,

Keep our Troops forever in Your care

Give them victory over the enemy...

Grant them a safe and swift return...

Bless those who mourn the lost.
.

FReepers from the Foxhole join in prayer
for all those serving their country at this time.



...................................................................................... ...........................................

U.S. Military History, Current Events and Veterans Issues

Where Duty, Honor and Country
are acknowledged, affirmed and commemorated.

Our Mission:

The FReeper Foxhole is dedicated to Veterans of our Nation's military forces and to others who are affected in their relationships with Veterans.

In the FReeper Foxhole, Veterans or their family members should feel free to address their specific circumstances or whatever issues concern them in an atmosphere of peace, understanding, brotherhood and support.

The FReeper Foxhole hopes to share with it's readers an open forum where we can learn about and discuss military history, military news and other topics of concern or interest to our readers be they Veteran's, Current Duty or anyone interested in what we have to offer.

If the Foxhole makes someone appreciate, even a little, what others have sacrificed for us, then it has accomplished one of it's missions.

We hope the Foxhole in some small way helps us to remember and honor those who came before us.

To read previous Foxhole threads or
to add the Foxhole to your sidebar,
click on the books below.

TANK LANDING SHIPS (LST)




"Large Slow Target"



The British evacuation from Dunkirk in 1940 demonstrated to the Admiralty that the Allies needed relatively large, ocean-going ships capable of shore -to-shore delivery of tanks and other vehicles in amphibious assaults upon the continent of Europe. As an interim measure, three medium-sized tankers, built to pass over the restrictive bars of Lake Maracaibo, Venezuela, were selected for conversion becau se of their shallow draft. Bow doors and ramps were added to these ships which became the first tank landing ships (LST's). They later proved their worth during the invasion of Algeria in 1942, but their bluff bows made for inadequate speed and pointed up the need for an all-new design incorporating a sleeker hull.

At their first meeting at the Argentia Conference in August 1941, President Roosevelt and Prime Minister Churchill confirmed the Admiralty's views. In November 1941, a small delega tion from the Admiralty arrived in the United States to pool ideas with the Navy's Bureau of Ships with regard to development of the required ship. During this meeting, it was decided that the Bureau of Ships would design these vessels.



Within a few days, John Niedermair of the Bureau of Ships sketched out an awkward looking ship that proved to be the basic design for the more than 1,000 LST's which would be built during World War II. To meet the conflicting requirements of deep draft for ocean travel and shallow draft for beaching, the ship was designed with a large ballast system that could be filled for ocean passage and pumped out for beaching operations. The rough sketch was sent to Britain on 5 November 1941 and accepted immediately. The Admiralty then requested the United States to build 200 LST's for the Royal Navy under the terms of lend-lease.

The preliminary plans initially called for an LST 280 feet in length; but, in January 1942, the Bureau of Ships discarded these d rawings in favor of specifications for a ship 290 feet long. Within a month, final working plans were developed which further stretched the overall length to 328 feet and called for a 50-foot beam and minimum draft of three feet 9 1/2 inches. This scheme distributed the ship's weight over a greater area enabling her to ride higher in the water when in landing trim. The LST could carry a 2,100-ton load of tanks and vehicles. The larger dimensions also permitted the designers to increase the width of the bow door opening and ramp from 12 to 14 feet and thus accommodate most Allied vehicles. Provisions were made for the satisfactory ventilation of the tank space while the tank motors were running, and an elevator was provided to lower vehicles from the main deck to the tank deck for disembarking. By January 1942, the first scale model of the LST had been built and was undergoing tests at the David Taylor Model Basin in Washington, D.C.



In three separate acts dated 6 February 1942, 26 May 1943, an d 17 December 1943, Congress provided the authority for the construction of LST's along with a host of other auxiliaries, destroyer escorts, and assorted landing craft. The enormous building program quickly gathered momentum. Such a high priority was assigned to the construction of LST's that the keel of an aircraft carrier, previously laid in the dock, was hastily removed to make place for several LST's to be built in her stead. The keel of the first LST was laid down on 10 June 1942 at Newport News, Va. ; and the first standardized LST's were floated out of their building dock in October. Twenty-three were in commission by the end of 1942.



The LST building program was unique in several respects. As soon as the basic design had been developed , contracts were let and construction was commenced in quantity before the completion of a test vessel. Preliminary orders were rushed out verbally or by telegrams, telephone, and air mail letters. The ordering of certain materials actually preceded the completion of design work. While many heavy equipment items such as main propulsion machinery were furnished directly by the Navy, the balance of the procurement was handled centrally by the Material Coordinating Agency -- an adjunct of the Bureau of Ships -- so that the numerous builders in the program would not have to bid against one another. Through vigorous follow-up action on materials ordered, the agency made possible the completion of construction schedules in record time.

The need for LST's was urgent, and the program enjoyed a high priority throughout the war. Since most shipbuilding activities were located in coastal yards and were largely used for construction of large, deep-draft ships, new construction facilities were established along inland waterways. In some instances, heavy industry plants such as steel fabrication yards were converted for LST construction. This posed the problem of getting the completed ships from the inland building yards to deep water. The chief obstacles were bridges. The Navy successfully undertook the modification of bridges and, through a "Ferry Command" of Navy crews, transported the newly constructed ships to coastal ports for fitting out. The success of these "cornfield" shipyards of the Middle West was a revelation to the long-established shipbuilders on the coasts. Their contribution to the LST building program was enormous. Of the 1,051 LST's built during World War II, 670 were constructed by five major inland builders.



By 1943, the construction time for an LST had been reduced to four months; and, by the end of the war, it had been cut to two months. Considerable effort was expended to hold the ship's design constant; but, by mid-1943, operating experience led to the incorporation of certain changes in the new ships. These modifications included: the replacing of the elevator by a ramp from the main deck to the tank deck, an increase in armament, and the addition of a distilling plant to make potable water. The main deck was strengthened to accommodate a fully-equipped landing craft, tank (LCT).


LST launching LCT


From their combat debut in the Solomons in June 1943 until the end of the hostilities in August 1945, the LST's performed a vital service in World War II. They participated in the invasions of Sicily, Italy, Normandy, and southern france in the European Theater and were an essential element in the island-hopping campaigns in the Pacific which culminated in the liberation of the Philippines and the capture of Iwo Jima and Okinawa.

The LST proved to be a remarkably versatile ship. A number of them were converted to become landing craft repair ships (ARL). In this design, the bow ramp and doors were removed, and the bow was sealed. Derricks, booms, and winches were added to haul damaged landing craft on board for repairs, and blacksmith, machine, and electrical workshops were provided on the main deck and tank deck.



Another successful conversion was the LST "Mother Ship." This version of the standard LST hull had two Quonset huts erected on the main deck to accommodate 40 officers. Bunks on the tank deck berthed an additional 196 men. A bake shop and 16 refrigeration boxes for fresh provisions augmented the facilities normally provided the crew. Four extra distilling units were added, and the ballast tanks were converted for storage of fresh water.

Thirty-eight LST's were converted to serve as small hospital ships. They supplemented the many standard LST's which removed casualties from the beach following the landing of their cargo of tanks and vehicles. For example, on D-day, LST's brought 41,035 wounded men back across the English Channel from the Normandy beaches. Other LST's, provided with extra cranes and handling gear, were used exclusively for replenishing ammunition. They possessed a special advantage in this role, as their size permitted two or three LST's to go simultaneously alongside an anchored battleship or cruiser to accomplish replenishment more rapidly than standard ammunition ships. In the latter stages of World War II, some LST's were even fitted with flight decks from which small observation planes were sent up during amphibious operations.


Low tide at Normandy


Throughout the war, LST's demonstrated a remarkable capacity to absorb punishment and survive. Despite the sobriquet, "Large Slow Target," which was applied to them by irreverent crew members, the LST's suffered few losses in proportion to their number and the scope of their operations.Their brilliantly conceived structural arrangement provided unusual strength and buoyancy. Although the LST was considered a valuable target by the enemy, only 26 were lost due to enemy action, and a mere 13 were the victims of weather, reef, or accident.

A total of 1,152 LST's were contracted for in the great naval building program of World War II, but 101 were cancelled in the fall of 1942 because of shifting construction priorities. 0f 1,051 actually constructed, 113 LST's were transferred to Great Britain under the terms of lend-lease, and four more were turned over to the Greek Navy. Conversions to other ship types with different hull designations accounted for 116.






FReeper Foxhole Armed Services Links




TOPICS: VetsCoR
KEYWORDS: freeperfoxhole; marines; navy; samsdayoff; tanklandingships; veterans; wwii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last
To: bentfeather
Good Morning Feather.
21 posted on 04/09/2004 9:34:38 AM PDT by SAMWolf (Proofread carefully to see if you any words out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Colonel_Flagg
Morning Colonel.

LST Production was deemed critical by Allied Planners, The Pacific and European Theatre commanders were both arguing that they needed priority in receiving LST's. In the Med some invasion schedules took into consideration how many LST's would be available. I've read that the invasion of Southern France kept getting pushed back because of LST shortages.
22 posted on 04/09/2004 9:38:27 AM PDT by SAMWolf (Proofread carefully to see if you any words out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Matthew Paul
Morning Matt.

Fox had a poll last night that showed almost half (44%) of the Democrats think the US should cut and run from Iraq.
23 posted on 04/09/2004 9:39:44 AM PDT by SAMWolf (Proofread carefully to see if you any words out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GATOR NAVY
Morning Gator Navy. Friday night and drunk, somehow they just seem to go together don't they?
24 posted on 04/09/2004 9:41:01 AM PDT by SAMWolf (Proofread carefully to see if you any words out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bogdanPolska12
Morning bogdanPolska12.

I hear you have a critical election coming up in your Country too. I fear for the U.S., if Kerry wins.
25 posted on 04/09/2004 9:42:43 AM PDT by SAMWolf (Proofread carefully to see if you any words out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: stand watie
Morning stand watie.

Free Dixie!
26 posted on 04/09/2004 9:43:05 AM PDT by SAMWolf (Proofread carefully to see if you any words out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
Hey Sam!!! how are you buddy. Don't worry everything will be fine. I wanna wish you great Easter.

God Bless
Bogdan
27 posted on 04/09/2004 9:49:48 AM PDT by bogdanPolska12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
Oh, yes. I'm not diminishing their contribution by any stretch.

The Americans did not feel that an invasion of Southern France was necessary in any event. One merely needs to look at the separate code names chosen by the Americans and British to see this (British: "Anvil"; Americans: "Dragoon").

The Americans also did not see the Italian campaign as a vital front in the beginning, as evidenced by the 1 1/2 divisions sent to land at Anzio under Mark Clark. If Roosevelt had had his way, Overlord might have taken place in 1943 provided the proper landing craft were in place.
28 posted on 04/09/2004 9:52:54 AM PDT by Colonel_Flagg ("We will either find a way or make one." - Hannibal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: E.G.C.
Good morning EGC. Have fun with the company, hope you have good weather for them.
29 posted on 04/09/2004 9:57:39 AM PDT by snippy_about_it (Fall in --> The FReeper Foxhole. America's History. America's Soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Colonel_Flagg
I'm not diminishing their contribution by any stretch.

I know you weren't I was just using your comment to throw in the LST bottleneck problem.

The U.S. always considered the Med a "sideshow" and resented having to allocate scarce resources to it. They knew slogging up the Italian Boot was not going to be the war winning theatre.

30 posted on 04/09/2004 9:59:38 AM PDT by SAMWolf (Proofread carefully to see if you any words out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: bogdanPolska12
Happy Easter to you. We're gonna have a beautiful Easter weekend weatherwise. 70's and sunny.
31 posted on 04/09/2004 10:00:44 AM PDT by SAMWolf (Proofread carefully to see if you any words out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: The Mayor
Good morning Mayor. We are starting a beautiful weekend, upper seventies today and through Sunday! Are you guys "warming" up at all?
32 posted on 04/09/2004 10:01:02 AM PDT by snippy_about_it (Fall in --> The FReeper Foxhole. America's History. America's Soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Aeronaut
Good morning Aeronaut. Looks like those little fat toy planes.
33 posted on 04/09/2004 10:02:59 AM PDT by snippy_about_it (Fall in --> The FReeper Foxhole. America's History. America's Soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: snippy_about_it; All

LST exploding during West Loch disaster in May 1944

West Loch Disaster

Pearl Harbor is divided into a series of lochs that fan out from Ford Island that sits in the center of harbor. West Loch was the staging area for the invasion fleets of the Pacific. In particular, vessels called LSTs or LCTs that had the capability to land on the shore, open their bows and deposit troops, stores and vehicles on the beach.

On Sunday morning, May 21, 1944, 29 LSTs readied for the invasion of Saipan, were nestled together at six berths. An LST carried a crew of 119 men and 200 marines, trucks, jeeps, and weapon carriers were carried on the main decks, all of which were loaded with ammunition and gas. Each vessel carried 80 to 100 drums of high-octane fuel on forecastle. Six thousand cubic feet of cargo ammunition was stowed on the deck with field guns and amphibious craft known as DUKWs. Besides the stores carried on by the troops and their vehicles, the ship had its own magazine and fuel capacity of 200,000 gallons. Drums of lubricating oil, fog oil smoke pots and floats were carried on the fantail -- an accident waiting to happen.

On May 21, 1944, at 3:08 p.m., an explosion blossomed out of LST-353. Apparently the blast originated near the bow of LST-963, where Army troops had been unloading mortar ammunition. Red hot fragments showered the clustered LSTs, igniting gasoline drums lined up on the exposed forecastles. In minutes, the explosions began to rip the invasion fleet apart. Fires began to blaze from stem to stern.

The explosions continued, damaging more than 20 buildings shoreside at the West Loch facility. For 24 hours fires raged aboard the stricken ships.

Burning LSTs at West Loch.

In all six LSTs were sunk and several severely damaged. Dead were 163 men and 396 were wounded.

Several investigations sought to find the reason for such a disaster, but no conclusive evidence as how it occurred was decided upon. Two major reasons have emerged as to the possible cause: The initial explosion was caused by gasoline vapor, or that one or more mortar shells exploded while being handled.

It was recommended that LSTs no longer be nested, so that disaster like that at West Loch could be avoided. Fleet Admiral Chester Nimitz disagreed. He felt that facilities were too limited at Pearl and that the nesting was necessary. "It is a calculated risk that must be accepted."'

During the explosions and fires, firefighters had prevented further loss of ships that would have delayed the invasion of Saipan. As it was, only a day was lost in the departure of the invasion fleet.

Today, only a few reminders of the West Loch disaster remain. For years, both during the war and after, the disaster at West Loch was veiled in secrecy and mystery. In particular, the bow of LST-480 is visible as it rusts in the tropical air of Oahu.

Conclusion

The attack on Pearl Harbor Dec. 7, the intense salvage activities that followed, the West Loch disaster, and almost 50 years of other natural and cultural processes since the war have contributed to the formation of the underwater archeological record in the study area. This has been a selective history written for a specific purpose: to make those archeological remains more understandable. There are many other facets to the history of Pearl Harbor that weren't discussed and which could be grist for other historian's pens. The preceding, however, should provide a backdrop for the reader who is focused on the fascinating images and facts that have been generated from field activities in this submerged cultural resources study of Pearl Harbor.

34 posted on 04/09/2004 10:05:26 AM PDT by SAMWolf (Proofread carefully to see if you any words out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: snippy_about_it
Howdy ma'am. Cool thread.
35 posted on 04/09/2004 10:10:48 AM PDT by Professional Engineer (Democreeps suck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Valin
1914 Tampico incident - US ship crew arrested in México

The FReeper Foxhole Remembers The Vera Cruz Incident (4/22/1914) - Sep. 28th, 2003
36 posted on 04/09/2004 10:12:01 AM PDT by snippy_about_it (Fall in --> The FReeper Foxhole. America's History. America's Soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Valin
Female Language Patterns...
"Please Do"
This is not a statement, it is an offer. The woman is giving you the chance to come up with an excuse for what you have done.
In other words, a chance to get yourself into even more trouble.


I'd like to know who's giving away all our secrets!
37 posted on 04/09/2004 10:13:41 AM PDT by snippy_about_it (Fall in --> The FReeper Foxhole. America's History. America's Soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bentfeather
Good morning feather.
38 posted on 04/09/2004 10:13:59 AM PDT by snippy_about_it (Fall in --> The FReeper Foxhole. America's History. America's Soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Colonel_Flagg
Good morning Colonel. Very useful indeed!
39 posted on 04/09/2004 10:14:40 AM PDT by snippy_about_it (Fall in --> The FReeper Foxhole. America's History. America's Soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Matthew Paul
Again, I'm proud of my people!

As you should be! Thanks Matt for the news.

40 posted on 04/09/2004 10:15:37 AM PDT by snippy_about_it (Fall in --> The FReeper Foxhole. America's History. America's Soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
VetsCoR
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson