Free Republic
Browse · Search
VetsCoR
Topics · Post Article

To: snippy_about_it; PhilDragoo; Johnny Gage; Victoria Delsoul; Darksheare; Valin; bentfeather; radu; ..
Churchill Infantry Tank at Dieppe 1942


During August 1942, 147 (Hampshire) Regiment RAC was stationed at Worthing on the south coast of England. It was regimental practice to maintain a listening watch on its No.19 wireless sets, a boring duty which, throughout the early hours of 19 August promised little diversion. However, towards dawn, freak reception brought a spate of transmissions. The accents were Canadian, but the speakers were obviously tank crew, and the operators began to log each message. It was not easy, since the rapid speech was that of men under stress, overlaid with the sound of gunfire. The transmissions continued for several hours, but petered out by mid-morning.

It was not until the newspapers began printing reports of the raid on Dieppe that the signals logs started to make sense. They told at first hand the tragic story of 2nd Canadian Division’s decimation on the beaches in front of the town, as seen from the Churchill turrets of 14th Army Tank Battalion, otherwise known as the Calgary Regiment.


An LCT (Black smoke, farther in the water.)(Tide not yet full out)


The object of the Dieppe raid was to test the defences on a sector of enemy-held coast known to be heavily fortified, and to apply the lessons learned when the Allies returned to continental Europe at a later date. As far as the Calgary Regiment was concerned its tasks were to support the Essex Scottish Regiment and Royal Hamilton Light Infantry off the beach and into the town, following which the tanks would shoot up the airfield at St Aubyn and attack the chateau of Arques-les-Batailles, which was suspected of being a divisional headquarters.

The beach, flanked by the East and West Headlands, consisted of heavily banked and graded shingle, and was backed by a sea wall which for most of its length was too high for the Churchills to scale. Beyond lay a wide stretch of open ground that had once been ornamental gardens, the Boulevard Foch, and then a row of hotels and houses. The whole area was covered from several directions by carefully sited anti-tank and machine gun posts, and the exits from the boulevard into the town had been sealed by concrete barriers.


This is apparently the only tank to reach the strand (shore proper) intact.


The Calgarys’ Churchills had been waterproofed and equipped with deep-wading exhausts which would see them ashore from the LCTs. To counter the effect of the shingle, which would scatter and slide about under the tracks, the first tanks out of the landing craft would carry an elementary bobbin which would unroll a carpet of hessian and wooden paling strips ahead of the vehicles and up to the sea wall, along which the others would follow. Where the sea wall was too high to cross, engineer teams would blow down sections to form ramps, and then go on to demolish the anti-tank walls blocking the routes into the town; however the engineers were on foot, and terribly vulnerable.

It goes almost without saying that the overall planning of the operation demanded that the East and West Headlands should be secured before the assault on the town beach went in; but because of a combination of the most evil bad luck and a certain amount of bad management, neither headland had been taken when the Essex, Hamilton and Calgary landing craft grounded on the shingle to find themselves trapped in a natural killing ground. Cross-fire from the headlands flayed the beach, while the landing craft were raked from the buildings beyond the sea wall. Some platoons were shot down as they crossed the lowered ramps, while the survivors of others tried to scrape what cover they could for themselves among the loose stones.


Germans Examining at Captured Churchill Tank at Dieppe


It had been decided that the tanks would land in four waves, made up as follows:



The first wave included three ‘Oke’ flamethrowers, one of which left its LCT too early and drowned, while the second had a track shot away and the third erupted into an inferno when the flame gun fuel tank was penetrated. Three more tanks lost tracks or bellied in the shingle; but the three survivors, Cougar, Cheetah and Cat, successfully crossed the beach on their carpet and climbed the sea wall, to be joined by four tanks from the second wave, whose fate had been as mixed as that of the first.



The third wave was committed at the same time as the reserve infantry battalion, the Fusiliers Mont Royal, but only ten tanks reached the shore due to damage sustained by the LCTs as the covering smoke screen began to disperse. Of these seven left the beach, while one remained jammed across the wall, engaging the houses with its guns fully depressed. The Calgarys’ commanding officer, Lt.-Col. Andrews, was shot down in the shallows after extricating his crew from their tank, which had been launched prematurely into deep water.

Approximately half the tanks ashore had now crossed the wall and were engaging the defences beyond. A French tank serving as a pillbox was blow apart by Cougar, while Cheetah engaged bunkers in the gardens, cutting down the occupants when they tried to make a run for it. Other tanks succeeded in suppressing the fire coming from the houses and hotels, one building being rammed to bring it down around the defenders’ ears; but the Churchills could not break into the town because of the concrete road-blocks, since the demolition teams had either been killed or were pinned down by the murderous cross-fire on the beach.



The Calgarys’ fourth wave did not land, for by 0900hrs it was clear to the operational commander that further effort was useless, and he gave the order to withdraw. All but six of the tanks returned to the beach, where an unsuccessful rescue was attempted; but of all the crews ashore, only one man succeeded in reaching England. The regiment’s casualties amounted to 13 killed, 4 wounded and 157 taken prisoner. That evening, with a consideration rare in total war, the Luftwaffe dropped a bundle of photographs onto the Calgarys’ barracks in Seaford, showing those who had survived the raid.

For the Canadian infantry Operation ‘Jubilee’ had been a bloodbath; but the terrible price they paid led directly to the development of the armoured engineer vehicles with which the Allied armies led their assault landings on 6 June 1944, with comparatively small loss of life for such an enormous undertaking.

Additional Sources:

staff.bus.bton.ac.uk
www.ospreypublishing.com
freespace.virgin.net/shermanic.firefly
users.swing.be/tanks.tanks/complet/ www.anecdotage.com
www.jed.simonides.org
cap.estevan.sk.ca
www.sunpoint.net/~mapatsik
www.archives.ca
www.wwiivehicles.com
www.bibl.u-szeged.hu
www.jodyharmon.com

2 posted on 03/09/2004 12:05:45 AM PST by SAMWolf (Why experiment on animals with so many liberals out there?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: All
The Churchill was undoubtedly one of the most successful British tanks of the Second World War. Although it suffered from being underarmed, a defect common to most British armoured vehicles of the period, it was nevertheless loved by its crews: its cross-country ability was unrivalled and it was less inclined to 'brew-up' from a direct hit than the Sherman. It was also adaptable. Modified Churchill's played a crucial part in the initial D-Day landings and in the subsequent advance through France.



Early Marks used a howitzer as well as the 2 pdr because at that point, the 2 pdr didn't have an HE round.

Early 6 pdr guns also didn't have the HE round available to them either, although this was rectified by the time the Churchill entered the Italian campaign.

By the time of the Italian campaign though, HE rounds were available for the 6 pdr guns, as were several other types of ammunition, such as APC.



Churchills in Russian Use:

Some early Marks of the Churchill were sent to Russia as part of the lend-lease agreement. These were Marks I, II and II models. However the Russians had no use for the 2 and 6 pdr guns, so they tended to replace them with their own superior 76.2mm L30 gun. Some Mark IVs and Crocodiles were also sent, some 35 Churchills being employed by the 5th Guard Tank Army at Kursk.



In 1942, with the war in North Africa at a critical stage, Winston Churchill - then serving as prime minister and minister of defense - delivered a historic speech before the House of Commons. Facing a motion of censure, Churchill delivered a ninety-minute oration, during which an MP asked about a certain 'Churchill' tank fiasco. "This tank," Churchill candidly explained, "was ordered off the drawing board and large numbers went into production very quickly. As might be expected, it had many defects and teething troubles, and when these became apparent, the tank was appropriately rechristened the 'Churchill.'

"These defects have now been largely overcome," he added. "I have no doubt that this tank will prove, in the end, a powerful, massive, and serviceable weapon of war."
[This self-deprecating joke was met with delighted laughter throughout the House; in the ensuing vote the motion was defeated by a majority - of 475 to 25.]


3 posted on 03/09/2004 12:06:01 AM PST by SAMWolf (Why experiment on animals with so many liberals out there?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SAMWolf; snippy_about_it
Morning troop : )

Great Britians R&D in tank design thru WW-2 may not have fielded a dominating tank for that period..but shortly after..the Centurion appeared..and it certainly had the legs to matter on the battlefield..and be workable/modifyable to be productive well into the 80's

The Yom Kippur war has a focus theme of infantry fired anti-tank missiles and early night vision equipment...here the narrative conveys Israels mounting tank losses and failure to impliment modern systems..which nearly cost them the war ..as some narratives go.

The Golan sector see's Israel with less than 200 Centurions and Shermans.

Attrition rates are high for Israel in the early days of the war...here..Israel is using blocking action action against numeric superiority.
I wish I could remember a book read many years ago on the Golan battles.
Several key points come to the forefront which forward why Israel was still able to hold the line.
The Centurion was comfortable to be in over Soviet design tanks...here fatigue is a factor in operational performance.
Israels tank maintenence crews are in some way the unsung heroes of the Golan battle.
Centurions were repaired under fire..towed short distances from the battle lines and quickly bogged to be back in service.
At this point..new crews are going back in..in most cases..with new tank commanders.
Israels training depth and reservist force allowed IDF to stay in the fight....shortly..Israels Airforce would begin to assist on the Golan..and the tide turned in Israels favor.

For several critical days..Israel was down to less than 40 operational Centurions..yet they were able to move rapidly to firing stations.
The Syrians were fooled by this action..thinking Israel had many tanks still.
Israeli tank commanders would change call names and ramp up the chatter on their voice net..knowing the Syrians were listening.
This blocking action and deception caused the Syrian advance to stall..soon..the IAF would decimate the Syrians with F-4 Phantom and A-4 Skyhawks carrying iron bombs,cluster bombs and napalm.
The Syrians were broken...hundreds of their tank and APC crews simply fled the battlefield ,,leaving empty units idling in the sun until fuel ran out.

Israeli communication and adaptive thinking held the line on the Golan.
The Centurion tank proved its value as it achieved a 5-1 and greater kill ratio over Soviet tanks.

In 1982..with reactive armor ,upgraded targeting and newer engines,
The Centurion still dominated its Soviet period counterpart in engagements.

A late WW-2 design tank from Great Britian,
that had legs for decades.

6 Day War 1967

Yom Kippur 1973

Lebanon 1982

51 posted on 03/09/2004 8:44:19 AM PST by Light Speed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
VetsCoR
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson