Free Republic
Browse · Search
VetsCoR
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The FReeper Foxhole's TreadHead Tuesday - PanzerKampfwagen V - Panther - Feb. 17th, 2004
www.wargamer.com ^

Posted on 02/17/2004 12:01:15 AM PST by SAMWolf



Lord,

Keep our Troops forever in Your care

Give them victory over the enemy...

Grant them a safe and swift return...

Bless those who mourn the lost.
.

FReepers from the Foxhole join in prayer
for all those serving their country at this time.


...................................................................................... ...........................................

U.S. Military History, Current Events and Veterans Issues

Where Duty, Honor and Country
are acknowledged, affirmed and commemorated.

Our Mission:

The FReeper Foxhole is dedicated to Veterans of our Nation's military forces and to others who are affected in their relationships with Veterans.

In the FReeper Foxhole, Veterans or their family members should feel free to address their specific circumstances or whatever issues concern them in an atmosphere of peace, understanding, brotherhood and support.

The FReeper Foxhole hopes to share with it's readers an open forum where we can learn about and discuss military history, military news and other topics of concern or interest to our readers be they Veteran's, Current Duty or anyone interested in what we have to offer.

If the Foxhole makes someone appreciate, even a little, what others have sacrificed for us, then it has accomplished one of it's missions.

We hope the Foxhole in some small way helps us to remember and honor those who came before us.

To read previous Foxhole threads or
to add the Foxhole to your sidebar,
click on the books below.

PanzerKampfwagen V
Panther




After meeting the Soviet T-34 tank in late 1941 the German army was considerably shaken to find that there was a tank better than its PzKpfw IV. Although work on a successor to the PzKpfw IV had started as early as 1937, which eventually became the Tiger heavy tank, it largely incorporated features from the earlier development prototypes and owed nothing to the T-34 design. After examining captured T-34s during an "on the spot" investigation, the key features of the T-34 design were assessed. The three main characteristics were:

  • the sloped armor which gave optimum shot deflection
  • the large road wheels which gave a stable and steady ride
  • the overhanging gun, a feature previously avoided by the Germans as impracticable


Wooden model of the Daimler-Benz proposal


Having received the commision's report on November 25 1941, the Heereswaffenamt contracted with two armament firms, Daimler-Benz and MAN, to produce designs for a new medium tank in the 30-35 ton class. To be ready for the following spring, the specifications called for a vehicle with 60mm frontal armor and 40mm side armor, a high velocity 75mm gun and the front and sides to be sloped like the T-34.


MAN Panther Ausf. D


In April 1942, the two designs were submitted, with an interesting contrast. Daimler-Benz proposal was an almost unashamed copy of the T-34 in layout, with the addition of a few refinements. It had a hull shape similar to the T-34 with turret mounted well forward; the driver sat within the turret cage. A diesel engine was fitted with transmission to the rear sprockets. Paired steel bogies without rubber tyres were suspended by leaf springs. Other features included jettisonable fuel tanks on the hull rear in T-34 fashion.


Panther Ausf. A


Hitler was impressed with the Daimler-Benz "T-34 type" proposal, although he suggested that the gun be changed from the 75mm L/48 model to the longer L/70 weapon, and prototypes went into production. Leaf springs were cheaper and easier to produce than torsion bars, and the diesel engine would have been an advantage in later years when petrol supply became restricted. However, the Heereswaffenamt preferred the MAN design, since simply copying the T-34 was unpatriotic and there were mechanical features of the T-34 which made copying an impractical proposition for German manufacturers.


Panther Ausf. G


The MAN design displayed original German thinking, sophisticated rather than simple. It had a higher, wider hull than either the Daimler-Benz design or the T-34, with a large turret placed well back to offset as much as possible the overhang of the long 75mm gun. Torsion bar suspension was used with interleaved road wheels, while a Maybach petrol engine was proposed, with drive to the front sprockets. The internal layout followed conventional German practice with stations for the driver and hull gunner/radio-operator in the front compartment.


The crew of a Panther, Eastern Front, April 1944


Militarily, there were two important prerequisites in the comparison of the two models: mass production should start in December 1942, and the weapon should be of superior quality to counter the numerical material superiority of the enemy. Daimler-Benz was not able to produce the turret for the deadline, and needed modifications on the turret as well. The recommendation of the MAN's proposal was presented to Hitler on 13 May 1942, and accepted. At the same time the specifications were restated, increasing the frontal armor thickness to 80mm, a change increasing the weight to 44 tons. By that time much of the design, like wheels and suspension, had been completed and subcontractors at work; throwing additional strain on components designed for the original weight, which lead to problems of unreliability in action.





TOPICS: VetsCoR
KEYWORDS: armor; freeperfoxhole; germany; itspesfault; panther; pzkfwv; tanks; treadhead; veterans; wwii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-212 next last
To: SAMWolf
ROFL That's my very favorite one.
141 posted on 02/17/2004 2:08:12 PM PST by Professional Engineer (Why shoud Geronimo get all the glory. My personal battle cry is~Sitting Bull!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: snippy_about_it


"Fight for Kowel" Poland, March/April 1944 by David Pentland

Although in the process of regrouping after their escape from the "Cherkassy Pocket", Panthers and Panzer Grenadiers of the crack 5th SS Panzer Division "Wiking" are part of the relief force hastily assembled and thrown in to free the strategically important city of Kowel in the Pripet Marshes. By April 10th the Soviet encirclement of the city was broken and "Wiking" were pulled out of the line to continue refitting.



"Panther at the Zoo", Tiergarten, Berlin 2nd May 1945 by David Pentland

Below the vast bulk of the "Zoo Bunker", one of three giant Flak towers designed to defend Berlin from air attack, some remnants of the city's defenders gather in an attempt to break out of the doomed capital. Amongst which are troops from the 9th Fallschirmjäger and Münchberg Panzer Divisions, including a rare nightfighting equipped Panther G of Oberleutnant Rasim's Company, 1/29th Panzer Regiment.

142 posted on 02/17/2004 2:09:42 PM PST by SAMWolf (Liberals are invulnerable to reason & logic. They are vulnerable to guns, knives & a bitch slap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
I used to have that as an Avatar at some Bulletin board
143 posted on 02/17/2004 2:11:46 PM PST by SAMWolf (Liberals are invulnerable to reason & logic. They are vulnerable to guns, knives & a bitch slap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: bentfeather
Hey there feather!

Ain't house cleaning just so much fun? LOL! With all these critters, it's an on-going ordeal. Carpet cleaning is a twice-a-year thing and now's the time. Ugh!

It must be nice having two 'puters.....we need another one so we don't have to toss for use of it. Hubby's bigger than I am and he can toss me farther than I can toss him. LOL!

Time to get back to work before my back stiffens up much more. Hope I don't lay myself up doing this. hehe!
144 posted on 02/17/2004 2:16:28 PM PST by radu (May God watch over our troops and keep them safe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
Just don't burst into flames or turn into a pile of dust on us. ;-)

Running around pulling all the shades! It's a close call! LOL!
Catch ya in a bit. :-)

145 posted on 02/17/2004 2:19:23 PM PST by radu (May God watch over our troops and keep them safe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Professional Engineer
HALFTRACKS.COM


146 posted on 02/17/2004 2:23:01 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (There are few problems which cannot be solved through the judicious application of high explosives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
Ooooo I have a new home page.
147 posted on 02/17/2004 2:33:21 PM PST by Professional Engineer (Why shoud Geronimo get all the glory. My personal battle cry is~Sitting Bull!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Professional Engineer
I forgot to ask last week when we discussed half-tracks. What were the reasons for the their development? Why did they disappear from use?

Largely, they were developments of heavy truck technology, using existing truck automotive components, particularly engine, chassis and drivetrain [the White truck company and International Harvester were the primary US manufacturers] combined with the replacement of rear multiple axles with the Kegresse tracked suspension and drive tracks in back for better ability to travel cross-country, particularly in snow or mud.

Once it was realized that fully enclosed personnel carriers with overhead protection from grenades and shell bursts would be needed, the weight of the additional armor needed became greater than the half-tracked configuration could reasonably be upscaled to accomodate. And too, some south and central American countries converted their halftracks to six-wheeled armored cars after the war, using axles from 5-ton military transport trucks, neatly reversing the concept from which the things were designed in the first place, and the 4-wheeled M3A1 scout car halftrack predecessor vehicle. The result was similar to the Russian BTR-152 armored truck.


148 posted on 02/17/2004 2:46:28 PM PST by archy (Concrete shoes, cyanide, TNT! Done dirt cheap! Neckties, contracts, high voltage...Done dirt cheap!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
thanks - great thread.
149 posted on 02/17/2004 3:09:03 PM PST by King Prout (I am coming to think that the tree of liberty is presently dying of thirst.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Professional Engineer
Ooooo I have a new home page.

LOL! Hey, you starting trouble on a ZOT thread?

150 posted on 02/17/2004 3:59:55 PM PST by SAMWolf (Liberals are invulnerable to reason & logic. They are vulnerable to guns, knives & a bitch slap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: archy
Thanks for the link to that BTR site.
151 posted on 02/17/2004 4:01:22 PM PST by SAMWolf (Liberals are invulnerable to reason & logic. They are vulnerable to guns, knives & a bitch slap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Professional Engineer
The Germans also had a television guided bomb as early as 1940.
152 posted on 02/17/2004 4:06:36 PM PST by U S Army EOD (Volunteer for EOD and you will never have to worry about getting wounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: U S Army EOD
Good Afternoon EOD.

Henschel Hs 293

This was the first guided missile that entered service in large numbers. The Hs 293 was a glide bomb of aeroplane configuration, with a underslung rocket engine. It was carried by bombers like the He 111, He 177, Do 217 or Fw 200. A radio command link was standard, and a flare in the tail burned to help the operator sighting. There were also versions with wire guidance, and the experimental Hs 293D had TV guidance. The sloop HMS Egret, on 27 August 1943, had the dubious honour of being the first ship sunk by a guided missile. Many other victims followed, including five destroyers. Over 2300 Hs 293 missiles were fired.

153 posted on 02/17/2004 4:16:21 PM PST by SAMWolf (Liberals are invulnerable to reason & logic. They are vulnerable to guns, knives & a bitch slap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
On the ball as usual Sam. The only draw back the Germans had was the controlling aircraft was vunerable. If they have had air superiority, we may have had a lot of problems. Just think what would have happened at Normandy if they still had an effective offensive airforce.
154 posted on 02/17/2004 4:36:57 PM PST by U S Army EOD (Volunteer for EOD and you will never have to worry about getting wounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: U S Army EOD
One of the unheralded results of the strategic bombing campaign was that the Germans didn't have an effective air force over france and the Normandy beaches, what they had left was trying to defend the skies over the Reich.

155 posted on 02/17/2004 4:41:37 PM PST by SAMWolf (Liberals are invulnerable to reason & logic. They are vulnerable to guns, knives & a bitch slap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Colonel_Flagg
Gotta love a lady who has her own tank!


156 posted on 02/17/2004 4:54:38 PM PST by snippy_about_it (Fall in --> The FReeper Foxhole. America's History. America's Soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
Not intentionally, for sure.
157 posted on 02/17/2004 5:37:51 PM PST by Professional Engineer (Why shoud Geronimo get all the glory. My personal battle cry is~Sitting Bull!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: Professional Engineer
LOL! We know that. Been there a few times myself, my sense of homor isn't always appreciated :-)
158 posted on 02/17/2004 5:40:44 PM PST by SAMWolf (Liberals are invulnerable to reason & logic. They are vulnerable to guns, knives & a bitch slap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4; Professional Engineer; SAMWolf; snippy_about_it
I finally just got back on the Internet, after wrestling with a combination of viruses, spyware and IE redirect software. Inexplicably, my virus protection hasn't been scanning or updating for months. But the real culprit was spyware, that our virus protection doesn't catch. Got an adware program that cleaned out over 100 items, including cookies. Grrrrrrrrr!!!

But things are looking up. The Panther was a cool tank - I'm looking forward to reading this thread, Sam. Thanks!

159 posted on 02/17/2004 5:42:24 PM PST by colorado tanker ("There are but two parties now, Traitors and Patriots")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
I finally just got back on the Internet, after wrestling with a combination of viruses, spyware and IE redirect software.

ARRRRRGH. Which reminds me I have to get Ad-Aware up on this machine.

160 posted on 02/17/2004 5:44:09 PM PST by SAMWolf (Liberals are invulnerable to reason & logic. They are vulnerable to guns, knives & a bitch slap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-212 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
VetsCoR
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson