Free Republic
Browse · Search
VetsCoR
Topics · Post Article

To: snippy_about_it; SAMWolf; PhilDragoo
Interesting thread. I hadn't known about the ancient submarine fleet up there. Alaska is one of the most beautiful places I've ever seen, but I sure wouldn't want to have to fight in the winter up there.

I know the plan was to take Attu and Kiska to provide a diversion for the attack on Midway, but I still shake my head over that strategy. Two islands of no strategic or economic importance whatsoever. I'm half surprised Nimitz didn't tell them, "you want them that bad, keep 'em." And what commander would would ever take the bait and leave Midway and the Hawaiian Islands lightly defended to go rescue Attu and Kiska??? Whoever dreamed that plan up had gotten into the Sake cabinet.

101 posted on 12/10/2003 1:16:23 PM PST by colorado tanker ("There are but two parties now, Traitors and Patriots")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]


To: colorado tanker
I'm half surprised Nimitz didn't tell them, "you want them that bad, keep 'em."

I have to agree with you on that one. I don't know who really got the worst of "Tying up enemy forces" us or the Japanese, both sides needed everything they could get into the main areas of combat. Those carriers might have made a difference in the Battle of Midway, even though they weren't top line fleet carriers.

102 posted on 12/10/2003 3:12:36 PM PST by SAMWolf (Ben Kenobi at the dinnertable: Use the FORKS, Luke!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
VetsCoR
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson