Free Republic
Browse · Search
VetsCoR
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The FReeper Foxhole Remembers The Siege of Fort Texas(May 3-9, 1846) - Nov 9th, 2003
cr.nps.gov ^ | Sharyn Kane & Richard Keeton

Posted on 11/09/2003 12:00:33 AM PST by SAMWolf



Lord,

Keep our Troops forever in Your care

Give them victory over the enemy...

Grant them a safe and swift return...

Bless those who mourn the lost.
.

FReepers from the Foxhole join in prayer
for all those serving their country at this time.


...................................................................................... ...........................................

U.S. Military History, Current Events and Veterans Issues

Where Duty, Honor and Country
are acknowledged, affirmed and commemorated.

Our Mission:

The FReeper Foxhole is dedicated to Veterans of our Nation's military forces and to others who are affected in their relationships with Veterans.

In the FReeper Foxhole, Veterans or their family members should feel free to address their specific circumstances or whatever issues concern them in an atmosphere of peace, understanding, brotherhood and support.

The FReeper Foxhole hopes to share with it's readers an open forum where we can learn about and discuss military history, military news and other topics of concern or interest to our readers be they Veteran's, Current Duty or anyone interested in what we have to offer.

If the Foxhole makes someone appreciate, even a little, what others have sacrificed for us, then it has accomplished one of it's missions.

We hope the Foxhole in some small way helps us to remember and honor those who came before us.

To read previous Foxhole threads or
to add the Foxhole to your sidebar,
click on the books below.

The Siege of Fort Texas


Although small and relatively unknown, Fort Brown in Brownsville, Texas was nonetheless important in the changing tides of history of two neighboring nations, the United States and Mexico. Juan Nepomuceno Cortina, photographed while governor of Tamaulipas, Mexico, led a bandit gang that sacked and burned United States border towns.

The original Fort Brown, shaped from dirt on the banks of the Rio Grande River, was hotly contested in the earliest battles of the Mexican-American War, which began in 1846. Later rebuilt nearby, Fort Brown was the base for soldiers hunting an outlaw many Mexicans considered a folk hero.


Brownsville, Texas, beside the Rio Grande River, is a short walk over the water from Matamoros, Mexico.


United States President James K. Polk, who envisioned a nation stretching to the Pacific Ocean, had been elected the year before. Much of the territory he sought belonged to Mexico, which then encompassed New Mexico, Arizona, and California. Polk hinted that if Mexico wouldn't sell these territories, the United States would seize them. He also championed Texas's claim to a southern border along the Rio Grande. Issues of western expansion and the disputed Texas border became intertwined.

"Manifest Destiny" was a popular slogan of the day, reflecting a view that the United States was destined to control vast territories. Bolstered by such sentiments, Polk sent an emissary to Mexico to buy western lands. When Mexican officials rejected the offer, Polk ordered U.S. troops, led by General Zachary Taylor, to invade the disputed region between Texas and Mexico. The president was knowingly courting war. If bloodshed erupted, however, he wanted Mexico to be perceived as the aggressor. Having United States forces in the disputed region increased the likelihood that Mexican troops would cross the Rio Grande and strike the first blows. Powerful voices in the United States spoke against Polk's provocations, including John Quincy Adams, a former president; John C. Calhoun, a former vice president; and philosopher Henry David Thoreau.



In March 1846, Taylor's army of 3,000 crossed the Nueces River and marched south, passing through today's sprawling King Ranch. At the Rio Grande, the general ordered a halt on a peninsular bluff beside a bend in the river, directly across from Matamoros. Seeing the U.S. soldiers, many of the 20,000 residents fled south, leaving behind a population of about 4,000 and the Mexican army.

Taylor Ignores Demands


United States troops paraded into their new camp with much pomp and ceremony. Drums beat, colorful flags and banners waved, and a band played martial music while Mexicans on the other side of the river quietly watched. The spectators must have been uneasy, wondering what would happen with so many foreign troops stationed a stone's throw away. Also watching were members of the Mexican army, about 5,000 strong, commanded by General Francisco Mejía.


General Zachary Taylor


Mejía quickly sent a message to Taylor, protesting the presence of U.S. troops on Mexican soil. Taylor responded that his army had every right to be there because they were on United States property. In the ensuing weeks, other increasingly insistent notes were sent demanding that Taylor and his men leave. All met the same response.

Taylor's soldiers spent this time building Fort Texas. (Only later, after blood spilled, was the post renamed Fort Brown.) Guided by chief engineer Captain Joseph K.F. Mansfield, they followed a plan calling for an earthen structure with walls 15 feet wide shaped into a six-sided star. Laboriously, the men molded and stamped the dirt. The finished walls would stand nine to 10 feet tall. They dug from ground surrounding the emerging fort walls, purposely hollowing out a ditch about eight feet deep and 15 to 22 feet wide, creating another defense around the fort perimeter. A draw bridge would span the ditch, and a gate would be placed at the only entrance.

When completed, the fort would project out to form palisades at each of the star's six points where soldiers placed cannons with barrels facing every possible approach, including Mexican gun emplacements on the opposite side of the Rio Grande. Sandbags stacked around the weapons gave added protection against incoming shells.


Plans for Fort Brown


From atop the fort walls, soldiers could see across the river into Matamoros. The tall spires of the stately Catholic cathedral, still in existence today facing the Plaza Hidalgo, were clearly visible. At least some of the city's inhabitants were undeterred from daily routines by the troops' close presence. Women continued to bring laundry to wash in the river on the Matamoros side, almost within the shadows of Fort Brown's menacing guns.

Nor were the Mexican forces idle while Fort Texas took shape. They strengthened Matamoros's defenses, its forts and gun emplacements. One of the forts of the era, the Casamata, still stands and is maintained as a museum of Mexican history.

War fever filled the air. Everyone expected shots to be fired, but nobody knew when or where.

Victory Belongs to Mexico


Rumors swirled that the Mexican army was crossing the Rio Grande, justified rumors because the new Mexican commander, General Mariano Arista, was considering just that. He feared that Matamoros could not withstand a siege if, as he expected, U.S. troops attacked. Arista decided to take the initiative.


General Mariano Arista


Meanwhile, Zachary Taylor dispatched a patrol of 63 mounted troops, called dragoons, to survey up river to learn whether the Mexican army was indeed crossing to threaten Fort Texas. On April 25, 1846, the dragoons, led by Captain Seth Thornton, rode through an opening into a field surrounded by thick brush at Ranchos Carricitos. The soldiers were headed toward buildings in the field when some 2,000 Mexican cavalrymen commanded by General Anastasio Torrejon appeared and sealed off the only exit. Shots were fired as the U.S. soldiers mounted a disjointed and futile charge, then galloped frantically in all directions, seeking escape.

The fight ended quickly. Eleven U.S. soldiers died, and most of the remaining force was captured, including Joseph Hardee who later became a Confederate general. But at least one dragoon escaped and slipped back to Fort Texas with word of the military disaster. Now the president had provocation to seek a declaration of war, which the United States Congress soon supplied. The push to complete Fort Texas intensified.



TOPICS: VetsCoR
KEYWORDS: fortbrown; forttexas; freeperfoxhole; mexicanwar; mexico; paloalto; texas; veterans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last
To: PhilDragoo
I was so fired up I forgot to say, Thank you Phil.
61 posted on 11/10/2003 4:47:52 AM PST by snippy_about_it (Fall in --> The FReeper Foxhole. America's History. America's Soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: snippy_about_it; SAMWolf
Sorry about getting back to this late.
*ugh*
Ended up raking leaves from noon to 3 PM yesterday.
After that, it was luggage marking duty so the owner will be able to ID their luggage in the airport.
I painted a blue rose and a red rose on the one side, and lettered their name in silver on the other.


Having been in artillery, I still have a hard time imagining something fired from a cannon flying slow enough to side step.
And yes, it'd be nice if that was the case for our guys all the time!
It just is mind numbing for me to try to imagine this.
The speed of the howitzer shell flying out the muzzle brake on my old howitzer was measured in meters per second, but to be able to side step a cannonball, it would have to be travelling somewhere in the 400 feet per second or so range like a giant bb gun pellet.
62 posted on 11/10/2003 5:34:12 AM PST by Darksheare (Proving that there are alternate perceptions of surreality Since Oct 2, 2000.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
No problem, you're never late for a Foxhole thread, we've been known to go back for months to pings.

Do you suppose that the cannon ball that could be side stepped was one that was near its end, you know, it had flown as far as it could and ready to plop? At some point does it slow down? My ignorance is showing. LOL.
63 posted on 11/10/2003 5:51:38 AM PST by snippy_about_it (Fall in --> The FReeper Foxhole. America's History. America's Soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: snippy_about_it
Possible as well.
Depends on where the guys doing the sidestepping were in relation to the firing piece, and said piece's range.

Cannonballs were notoroious for poor flight characteristics.
Being round and largely smooth, they slowed down rapidly in the air due to their own wake turbulence.
(Kinda like creating it's own riptide behind itself.)

the invention of the canister shot and the conical shell made it possible to reach further ranges and better accuracy.
And higher shell speeds, for farther along it's arc.

At the end of it's flight, the cannonball would definately be close to hitting the ground and becoming ground clutter.
And more than likely would be rapidly slowing.
What was described was one of the most one-sided artilery duals in history.
Obsolete cannon versus canister shot... egads.
64 posted on 11/10/2003 6:14:42 AM PST by Darksheare (Proving that there are alternate perceptions of surreality Since Oct 2, 2000.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
Thanks Darksheare.
65 posted on 11/10/2003 11:30:46 AM PST by snippy_about_it (Fall in --> The FReeper Foxhole. America's History. America's Soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: snippy_about_it; SAMWolf
I list November 9 as a historic holiday on my calendar: Berlin Wall Day. The Cold War had been part of life for as long as I could remember. I was so proud and so thrilled to see than evil wall knocked down by free citizens. People laughed at Reagan for having that vision, just as they are laughing at President Bush today.
66 posted on 11/10/2003 12:55:47 PM PST by colorado tanker ("There are but two parties now, Traitors and Patriots")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo
Thanks for the info on the Colt pistol and the Cannon. Arty sure has jumped in development.
67 posted on 11/10/2003 12:59:03 PM PST by SAMWolf (Everyone hates me because I'm paranoid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: mark502inf; snippy_about_it; SAMWolf
Grant reflected the views of many northerners, especially northern Whigs. Many in the north thought the south brought on the Mexican War to gain more land south of the Missouri Compromise line for potential slave states.
68 posted on 11/10/2003 12:59:47 PM PST by colorado tanker ("There are but two parties now, Traitors and Patriots")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
To be honest I never thought I'd see the day that the Berlin Wall came down and Germany was re-united.
69 posted on 11/10/2003 1:01:06 PM PST by SAMWolf (Everyone hates me because I'm paranoid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
An interesting fact about Field Marshal Montgomery was his view that the West would never succeed in reuniting Germany. He advocated throwing in the towel on the Cold War and recognizing Soviet hegemony over eastern Europe as permanent.
70 posted on 11/10/2003 1:08:11 PM PST by colorado tanker ("There are but two parties now, Traitors and Patriots")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
Well, I never had a high opinion of Field Marshal Montgomery to begin with. He was way over-rated IMHO.
71 posted on 11/10/2003 1:27:24 PM PST by SAMWolf (Everyone hates me because I'm paranoid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
Yeah, Monty was overrated. By the time he finally attacked at Alamein, Monty had such superiority in troops and equipment even McClellan could have one the battle.

Another interesting fact I learned about Monty at the Imperial War Museum is that after the 1948 Israeli war of independence broke out but before the British completed their evacuation, Monty urged the General Staff to order a British attack on the Jewish troops holding Haifa because he was offended the Jews would occupy a port reserved by the U.N. to the Arabs. I saw no evidence he was troubled by the Arab invasion of Jewish territory, however. Monty seems to have had the anti-Semitism typical of the British upper class.

72 posted on 11/10/2003 1:36:10 PM PST by colorado tanker ("There are but two parties now, Traitors and Patriots")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: snippy_about_it
Welcome.
There's more to it, and better info than I have, but it's alot more involved as a descrip.
73 posted on 11/10/2003 2:40:47 PM PST by Darksheare (Proving that there are alternate perceptions of surreality Since Oct 2, 2000.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
VetsCoR
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson