Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
"Your real issue appears to be 'If we don't control this behavior, then others may join in.'"

Close. My issue is that we be allowed to set standards for our community, provided the standards are constitutional.

What's this "we" garbage? If "we" as individuals don't have the right to do what "we" want provided that no other individual is harmed, then there is no "we". And that is as Constitutional as it gets.
88 posted on 01/22/2004 3:40:21 AM PST by ABQNM_Libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: ABQNM_Libertarian
"provided that no other individual is harmed,"

That's your standard.

Since the rest of us wish to live in a society that does not consist of selfish, self-centered, immoral, hedonistic individuals, we've added other laws.

93 posted on 01/22/2004 9:53:13 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson