[billbears]

Well jmc all we can have then are muzzle loaders. Technically I suppose you could consider a cannon a muzzle loaded weapon. Wonder what kind of damage that would do compared to a now-dreaded (apparently) .50 cal? Talk about collateral damage!! You'd go through half a neighborhood with one shot. Bt at least we'd be safe from a .50 cal. BTW family, since Smith and Wesson has just released a .50 cal handgun are those allowed? Or should we turn those into the government too?

[familyop]

A 50 cal revolver won't demolish the next town in an
inter-clan feud like a 50 machine gun mounted on a
pickup truck could. I have no problem with the
revolver, but then neither would our forefathers. I
think they would be terrified by yokels playing with
the machinegun, though.

...don't want the hippies in the next town to ever
get ahold of vehicle mounted machine guns or demo.

Yuk. Thinking about some weapons reminds me of long,
boring days and nights on Army ranges.