But, IMO, there's something wrong with people who want to own weapons of mass destruction if they're not members of our military
Nuclear weapons are different in that they will harm the person you're aiming at in one fell swoop. And your statement that weapons of mass destruction now include apparently anything you don't feel safe around? I thought it was (at least according to the government at this point and time) just nuclear and chemical weapons. Don't let the government know, they'll have another limitation on the 2nd Amendment right out
I'm a Republican, not an anarchist. IMO, anarchists and their associates are out to help the Saddamocrats win elections.
Well I'm a conservative, not a Republican. And I'm for saving and returning to the limitations found in the Constitution for the government of this Republic, not making you feel safe, warm, and cozy. BTW, nice fell swoop name calling there. Anyone who doesn't agree with you is now an anarchist or a Saddamocrat
That's a slippery ad hominem attack. But what is the most powerful weapon you would allow in the hands of citizens who aren't in the military? Would you legalize the ownership and carrying loaded 30mm chain guns on the vehicles of non-military citizens? ...just trying to pin down some position on your part here, but they keep slipping away.
You posted "Frum's Flimflam." Do you agree with that piece?
"BTW, nice fell swoop name calling there. Anyone who doesn't agree with you is now an anarchist or a Saddamocrat."
I won't bite on the recurrent straw man and accusation. But I will say that anyone who disagrees with war being waged for the defense of the USA is not a conservative. Anyone who wants to legalize any and all drugs with absolutely no regulation is not a conservative. Anyone who pushes the "separation of church and state" and "freedom from religion" hype (which is not in the Constitution) is not a conservative. Anyone who wants to legalize the ownership by drug dealers/pimps of fully automatic, large bore weapons is not a conservative. Anyone who would want to authorize a 50% (or was it 50 cent?) gas tax, as Perot said he intended to do, is not a conservative.
My positions are clear. What are your positions on these matters?