One should not get into the business of picking specks out of the eyes of others when he has a log sticking out of his own. In light of your recent charade regarding the questions I posed to you over issues of morality, it would seem that that your position qualifies as an extreme example of the above.
As for the article, what specifically do you wish to know about my opinion? Do you ask if I want to get RINO's out of elected office? If so, I need only note that I have been actively pursuing that goal for the last five years in Texas.
I do not completely agree with the characterization of the Texas slate this year as ready for the fall or preferable to the alternative. The governor Republicans nominated is a tax and spend mohammedan-loving politically correct "hate crimes" legislation supporting RINO. The rest of the statewide non-judicial ticket is made up of eithern incumbents and establishment get along crowd types, except for Land Commissioner nominee Jerry Patterson - the only true right winger in the bunch. The judicial ticket is both good and bad - two major RINO incumbents are on the ticket, but we did manage to knock off one of our RINO governor's pro-abort "moderate" appointments to the state supreme court in the primary and replace him with a conservative. So I guess that's my take on the article.
it pretty obvious that I have a 'base' in asking it.
Even delusional persons find what exists immediately before them in their minds to be obvious, no matter how absurd it is to the rest of us. Your "base" constitutes nothing more than the fact that I disagreed with your goofy positions on morality and specifically abortion. Since basing a conclusion on something that is itself irrational leads to an irrational conclusion, your assertion is baseless.
You appear to be obsessed.
Is that what you tell everybody who responds to your posts when you ping them? I don't believe that I have done anything more than that, which hardly qualifies as an obsession in the normal understanding of the word given by sane and reasonable persons. Then again, you are neither.