Do you guys ever get any facts right?
Ron Paul’s initial “endorsement” wasn’t to any specific candidate, but instead was for his supporters to consider ANY of the 4 “third-party” candidates: Barr, Baldwin, McKinney and Nader.
Barr, who didn’t even show up to the press conference, then pressed Paul to make an actual endorsement, so Paul endorsed Baldwin.
The press conference was an agreement by the 3 candidates that showed up on 4 issues: civil liberties, foreign policy, the fed, and the national debt.
You can watch the full video and read about the agreement in an article I published with my national endorsements for 2012:
http://freeindependentsun.com/permaculture/end-the-war-a-mem...
http://www.dailypaul.com/196532/did-ron-paul-ever-give-his-endorsement-to-cynthia-mckinney
Yes, the fact is that Paul endorsed Cynthia McKinney, you think that she or Ralph Nader should be President? Paul does.
Ron Paul’s endorsement of 2008 given on September 10th.
“This can be accomplished by voting for one of the non-establishment principled candidates – Baldwin, Barr, McKinney, Nader, and possibly others. (listed alphabetically)”
“Ron Paul was joined by third party candidates Chuck Baldwin, Cynthia McKinney, and Ralph Nader who issued the following joint statement and agreement:”
http://www.ronpaul.com/ronpaul2008/events/ron-paul-press-conference/
You’re using the Daily Paul as a source and now you’re accusing others of not getting it right ?
Arrogant little Paulbot, ain’tcha ?