Skip to comments.
Ron Paul: Our Liberties Come From Our Creator
Christian Post ^
| 2011-06-04
| Stephanie Samuel
Posted on 06/05/2011 6:54:55 AM PDT by rabscuttle385
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
To: bamahead
"We have, as a people, lost our confidence and our understanding of what true liberty is all about and where it comes from," he summed. "It doesn't come from the government. Our liberties come from our Creator."bump!
2
posted on
06/05/2011 6:55:36 AM PDT
by
rabscuttle385
(Live Free or Die)
To: rabscuttle385
Making a few good points on a single issue does not detract from the fact that Paul is a kook.
To: humblegunner
Well said, hg! Right on target!
4
posted on
06/05/2011 6:58:39 AM PDT
by
Ditter
To: rabscuttle385
We can either look to God to meet our needs and solve our problems or look to government. Look to God or government to protect you. Choose this day whom you will serve.
To: humblegunner
Making a few good points on a single issue does not detract from the fact that Paul is a kook.And compare this to the current president, who makes no good points on any issue. By that measure alone Dr. Paul is a far superior candidate for president than 0bama ever will be.
6
posted on
06/05/2011 7:01:00 AM PDT
by
pnh102
(Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
To: rabscuttle385
The first question I had when reading this is;
By saying that Israel doesn’t need an earthly government is Ron Paul here alluding to his own desire to see the end of Israel?
He makes statements about them not needing an earthly government? With his anti-semitic background of supporting and appeasing terrorist nations and terrorist’s rights it makes me wonder.
7
posted on
06/05/2011 7:04:12 AM PDT
by
TheBigIf
To: rabscuttle385
broken clock. He’s still a nutjob.
8
posted on
06/05/2011 7:06:39 AM PDT
by
madmaximus
(Liberaltarians=junkies,anti-semites,anti-military,cultural marxists without all the taxes)
To: pnh102
And compare this to the current president, who makes no good points on any issue. By that measure alone Dr. Paul is a far superior candidate for president than 0bama ever will be. So is the wino begging for change outside the corner store.
That doesn't mean you wound want him as president, does it?
To: humblegunner
So is the wino begging for change outside the corner store.That doesn't mean you wound want him as president, does it?
Even that person would be a better choice than 0bama.
10
posted on
06/05/2011 7:18:08 AM PDT
by
pnh102
(Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
To: pnh102
Dr. Paul is a far superior candidate
To: rabscuttle385
No one else running understands the limits placed on the federal government by the constitution like Dr. Paul.
12
posted on
06/05/2011 7:35:47 AM PDT
by
andyk
(Wealth != Income)
To: andyk
No one else running
invents the limits placed on the federal government by the constitution like Dr. Paul.
There fixed it for you. The Founders never advocated for the strict isolationist vision of the pervert Paul and specifically gave the power of Commander-in-Chief to the President and not the Congress. The Founders would be appalled of the pervert Paul and his vision to treat homosexuality as equal to heterosexuality in our Armed Forces. The Founders would have strongly admonished the pervert Paul on his support for Iran's quest to gain nuclear bombs and for his support of a Victory mosque at Ground Zero.
13
posted on
06/05/2011 7:51:06 AM PDT
by
TheBigIf
To: rabscuttle385
I prefer an atheist who is anti-terrorist, pro-market, pro-life, pro-family values and who is not the kind of atheist who targets just one religion out of spite while defending Islam, to a Christian who is either a socialist or soft on terror or who is anti-family. So I see this as a sign that Ron Paul has gone off the deep end.
14
posted on
06/05/2011 7:56:02 AM PDT
by
JimWayne
To: rabscuttle385; Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; ..
"He says the king will take your young men and the young women to be used in the government. They're going to tax you. They're going to over burden you and you're going to have to work so much time, like 25, 35 45 percent of the time, for the king."
Libertarian ping! Click
here to get added or
here to be removed or post a message here!
View past Libertarian pings here
15
posted on
06/05/2011 8:10:27 AM PDT
by
bamahead
(Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
To: TheBigIf
I’m willing to listen to rational arguments. However, what strikes me is the name-calling. We are doomed in 2012.
16
posted on
06/05/2011 8:18:33 AM PDT
by
andyk
(Wealth != Income)
To: andyk
Other than not realizing that the Fed can’t be audited by the President, that he supports $400 million in earmarks and believes that ethanol subsidies are a good idea. Right...he is our guy (sarc)
17
posted on
06/05/2011 8:28:46 AM PDT
by
chilepup
To: chilepup
Other than not realizing that the Fed cant be audited by the President, that he supports $400 million in earmarks and believes that ethanol subsidies are a good idea.
Ron Paul supports ethanol subsidies? I would like to see a cite for that, if you can. Presidential candidates always campaign on things they will accomplish while in office - it does not mean that they literally believe their office has the power in and of itself to do it. The earmarks is a legitimate argument. However, there is no one running that would request less money, and advocate for the elimination of entire departments, except for Paul. Can you name someone that would be better on the budget?
18
posted on
06/05/2011 8:45:02 AM PDT
by
andyk
(Wealth != Income)
To: rabscuttle385
Our Liberties Come From Our Creator Preaching to the choir?
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
19
posted on
06/05/2011 9:28:48 AM PDT
by
kbennkc
(For those who have fought for it, freedom has a flavor the protected will never know.)
To: andyk
Yes, Cain, Palin, Bachmann, et al, would do better on a budget. Why? In Palins case, because she had to set them and stick to them while governor, and Cain, because of his extensive business background. Paul is a hack, who says one thing and does another...he has been doing this for 30 years while pulling the wool over people’s eyes. Besides, he was just appointed as Head of the Monetary sub-committee...this gives him the power to do the things he wants (audit the Fed, etc). Why would he want to give this up for a diminished leadership role as President?
Just look on this site a 2012’s for ethanol...you will see his support for the T. Boone Pickens boondoggle, and his “explanation” for this support.
20
posted on
06/05/2011 9:51:52 AM PDT
by
chilepup
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson