Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article

To: Captain Kirk

I call it as I see it. Ron Paul does blame America for the War on Terror. He claims that if Americans weren’t over there that they wouldn’t have attacked us. He is a Code Pink type of politician. He is not someone who upholds the spirit of the Founders but is a pretender.

The TEA party is not at all about creating a weak National Security or about spouting propaganda blaming America in the war on terror. It is about returning to a strong America built upon rugged individualism, limited government, adherence to the Constitution and a strong National defense.


66 posted on 05/24/2010 12:59:38 PM PDT by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: TheBigIf
No, he claims that if American government BASES weren't there, they probably wouldn't have attacked. That isn't controversial. Even Mr. Neocon himself, Paul Wolfowitz, agrees that they are attacking primarily because the U.S. government is over there:

There are a lot of things that are different now, and one that has gone by almost unnoticed--but it's huge--is that by complete mutual agreement between the U.S. and the Saudi government we can now remove almost all of our forces from Saudi Arabia. Their presence there over the last 12 years has been a source of enormous difficulty for a friendly government. It's been a huge recruiting device for al Qaeda. In fact if you look at bin Laden, one of his principle grievances was the presence of so-called crusader forces on the holy land, Mecca and Medina. I think just lifting that burden from the Saudis is itself going to open the door to other positive things.

83 posted on 05/24/2010 3:10:57 PM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson