To: bamahead; Bokababe; djsherin; dcwusmc
There is nothing conservative about spending money we dont have simply because that spending is for defense. No enemy can harm us in the way we are harming ourselves, namely bankrupting the nation and destroying our own currency. The former Soviet Union did not implode because it was attacked; it imploded because it was broke. We cannot improve our economy if we refuse to examine all major outlays, including so-called defense spending.*Ping!*
2 posted on
05/24/2010 10:03:00 AM PDT by
rabscuttle385
(Live Free or Die)
To: rabscuttle385
Um, defense spending is one of the few assignments given to the federal government by the US Constitution.
5 posted on
05/24/2010 10:08:54 AM PDT by
Reddy
(B.O. stinks)
To: rabscuttle385
This is exactly whereas Paul is dangerous to this nation. He of course would slice our military spending down to merely protecting the borders. Paul would pay no attention to Iran pursuing nuclear bombs, he would let them have them. No more protection for American interests abroad. No more helping deter genocide in the world. No more helping expand the cause of freedom.
6 posted on
05/24/2010 10:09:10 AM PDT by
TheBigIf
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson