Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
It would have gone from 3% of net to 3% of gross to 3% of wealth which would be redefined as "income" every Jan. 1.

Maybe, but probably not. Had there been a limit in the 16th Amendment, it would have meant that the Progressives weren't that strong, or the anti-Progressives not that gullible.

I just think that we would have had a slower progression, had the conservatives been a bit more conservative in their grant of new taxing power.

50 posted on 04/05/2010 5:24:42 PM PDT by slowhandluke (It's hard to be cynical enough in this age.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: slowhandluke

You discount the 97 years since.


52 posted on 04/05/2010 5:35:01 PM PDT by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (NEW TAG ====> **REPEAL OR REBEL!** -- Islam Delenda Est! -- Rumble thee forth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson