Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article

To: flintsilver7
Well, this statement was certainly not well thought-out. There are dozens (if not hundreds) of offenses that are non-violent but have a direct negative impact on either society as a whole or an individual.

Well, your statement was certainly not well thought-out, either. Please remember that we have a FEDERAL government, not a national one -- & the Constitution leaves the crime-fighting iowers to the states. The only area that I know of where Congress has been given exclusive authority to decide these issues is in the District of Columbia.

The crimes that the federal government have been given the authority to punish have been written in clear language (treason, bribery, piracy on the high seas, etc., etc.) & NO others. The STATES have retained their rights to firght their own versions of the Drug War as strongly or as leniently as they so desire, provided that cruel & unusual punishment is not used.

70 posted on 04/04/2010 7:53:46 AM PDT by ChrisInAR (Alright, tighten your shorts, Pilgrim, & sing like the Duke!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: ChrisInAR

I said nothing about the limitations of state and federal governments. I said that the original statement was not well thought-out and illustrated why. You appear to be responding to something entirely beyond the scope of what I said.

Try reading it again. I am not wrong in criticizing his statement.


89 posted on 04/04/2010 8:14:18 AM PDT by flintsilver7 (Honest reporting hasn't caught on in the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson