[Rockingham]

The benefit is an understanding of how the Court treats stare decisis, as opposed to how attorneys argue it in an amicus brief. I referred you to the Cato brief as they seem closest to your views on Raich and I surmise that in some fashion you are relying on Cato's work.

[tacticalogic]

I’m not familiar with this particular paper. I am familiar with the CATO Institute.

[tacticalogic]

The benefit is an understanding of how the Court treats stare decisis, as opposed to how attorneys argue it in an amicus brief.

Why don't the attorneys just argue it the way the court's going to treat it?