[tacticalogic]

Oh, that’s your excuse? I thought it was because you long ago exhausted your stock of pertinent subject matter knowledge.

You're demonstrating an impressive ability to make erroneous assumptions.

[Rockingham]

Here's link to the Cato Institute brief in the Citizen's United case before the Supreme Court: Cato brief.

It's worth reading as an example of how lawyers deal with stare decisis and contrary precedents before the Supreme Court, and the Court itself deals with stare decisis in a major case.

Here are the opinions: Citizens United.