And none of his coleqgues on the other side of the issue ever accused him of basing his support for original intent on a desire to smoke dope that I recall.
I don't consider personal attacks a valid basis for argument, but if answering them in kind is the only thing that's going to be understood, I can do that if I have to.
Oh, that’s your excuse? I thought it was because you long ago exhausted your stock of pertinent subject matter knowledge.