Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Infantile SIMPLICITY of Health Care Reform

Posted on 03/03/2010 7:15:46 AM PST by Zanton

The key to highest quality and lowest cost in doctoring is this: No Welfare State mandates on health care. No "helpful" regulations on doctors, medicines, medical procedures, or overall treatment plans. Let people buy any kind of drugs, health care, or medical insurance they want, from anyone they want, from anywhere on earth. It's called freedom.

Case closed. Nothing else to discuss or debate.


TOPICS: General Discussion; Issues
KEYWORDS: freedom; healthcare; libertarianism; objectivism

1 posted on 03/03/2010 7:15:47 AM PST by Zanton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Zanton
But, but, but... how are we supposed to control the spiraling health care costs/greedy insurance companies/doctors and hospitals/healthcare fraud/the poor uninsured/people who don't know what's best for them/everyone under this system?
(Pick your favorite). /sarc

Gov't Health Care should be called Health Control since there is hardly anything about Care in those bills.
2 posted on 03/03/2010 7:28:02 AM PST by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zanton

I love it, and have been advocating for this in my personal life for years. The only objection I get is from those that worry about antibiotics overuse causing bacteria and virus changes that will threaten mankind. When I tell them that the evening news brings this kind of story up to keep the “sheeple” in line, they look at me like I have three heads. The truth is, antibiotic overuse is now and has always been rampant among the gay population, among health care workers, and within the “ruling class” of public servants. It is only the mass that makes up the ruling class, that is denied access. Without having to go to see a doctor when the kids get the sniffles and running up a bill for the insurance company, BILLIONS would be saved.

Another way to cut costs from Doctor bills would be to put them under the law. If a doctor can be proven to have harmed a patient in a malicious or careless procedure, they should face the legal system, and go to jail. Why do they need to carry huge insurance policies, when it is the few that are “bad” doctors. Tort reform to control costs of malpractice payouts would also cut overhead in the BILLIONS per year.


3 posted on 03/03/2010 7:31:15 AM PST by runninglips (Don't support the Republican party, work to "fundamentally change" it...conservative would be nice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: runninglips
It is only the masses that makes up the voting class, that is denied access.

Should have proof read better, sorry.

4 posted on 03/03/2010 7:34:15 AM PST by runninglips (Don't support the Republican party, work to "fundamentally change" it...conservative would be nice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1
Gov't Health Care should be called Health Control since there is hardly anything about Care in those bills.

Good point. Gov't control leads to the Soviet Union -- not just in health care, but in everything!

The key to low cost and high quality is laissez-faire capitalism. Poor people will be much fewer in number and fare much better under private charity.

5 posted on 03/03/2010 7:46:09 AM PST by Zanton (a polite & open-minded, but fierce, advocate of classical liberalism & libertarianism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: runninglips

All good points. Tort reform is essential. Current medical malpractice costs and insurance costs are ridiculous and wildly unjust.

As for the overuse of anti-biotics, this problem is tricky. But heavy social pressure — not gov’t coercion — should solve the problem. Doctors and clinics which help create “superbugs” should be boycotted and bankrupted. Really severe and obvious cases, of course, should result in prosecution and jail (and even maybe execution).


6 posted on 03/03/2010 7:54:14 AM PST by Zanton (a polite & open-minded, but fierce, advocate of classical liberalism & libertarianism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Zanton
Poor people will be much fewer in number and fare much better under private charity.

Right! Reminds me of something Rush Limbaugh said a few months ago:

Liberals measure compassion by the number of people who receive gov't assistance.
Conservatives measure compassion by the number of people who no longer need it.

7 posted on 03/03/2010 8:49:38 AM PST by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1
Reminds me of something Rush Limbaugh said a few months ago...

Rush "Hillbilly Heroin" Limbaugh is no friend of drug freedom or "live-and-let-live" or the general philosophy of individual liberty. Conservatives like him want to make us "good" via government coercion. They favor drug tyranny, prostitution tyranny, gambling tyranny, criminalization of abortion, criminalization of assisted suicide, banning of gays in marriage and adoption and the military, mandatory school prayer, censorship of movies and broadcast and print and internet, etc. They want to force us to be "moral."

The conservative notion of what constitutes "goodness" and "morality" is mostly false and evil, and they use government tyranny to coerce it. :-(

8 posted on 03/03/2010 9:10:34 AM PST by Zanton (a polite & open-minded, but fierce, advocate of classical liberalism & libertarianism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson