Not scared of the non-threat of a nuclear-armed Iran? Then why have you neocons been crying about this for years? You're either scared, or you are using the Iranian boogyman as an excuse to start another criminal war.
You neocons handle threats? Let me get this straight... the potential threat of a nuclear-armed, muslim Iran is such an imminent danger that Iran must be stopped?
Well, if that's so, what about Pakistan? Nuclear-armed and overrun by nutty muzzies. How come you strong, threat-handling he-men have passed on a current threat in order to tackle a potential future threat?
I'll tell you why - you guys think Iran will be a pushover but Pakistan just might use those nukes to defend themselves if attacked.
That's the reason I'd never support a pre-emptive US strike against Iran - what with being threatened daily by the US & it's european puppets, the Iranians would be fools to not take every measure open to them to increase their ability to deter or withstand US attack.
Paul is to the left of Hussein Obama....lol...what a fruitcake Paul is.
Barak Hussein Osama appreciates your kind words and support, and your lies... 2006 ACU rating - Ron Paul 76, barry osama (your guy) 8
Neo-cons lol.
Did the Paul Directive point toward Jews today or just anybody that is not a pacifist like Paul?
No threat from Iran hugh?
They have been the number one supporter and exporter of terros since 1979. They consist of a bunch of Theocrat mullah dictators.
You don’t allow a country as radical as that acquire nuclear weapons. It will eventually lead to war in the Mideast. That is a direct threat against our national security.
More direct is letting a terrorist country get nuclear materials which could be sold covertly to a terrorist to bring to the US. Especially a dirty bomb made out of nuclear material.
Yes, we should use Israel as a proxy or directly take out their ability to build and deliver nuclear weapons.
Our policy...is to deny the regime nuclear weapons. Whether it is enforced by Obama is another matter.