To: americanophile
Which part of the constitution does his contention that the use of A9 Ace armored bulldozers against enemy trench lines instead of going in hand to hand constitutes a war crime come from?
The Marines have not forgotten.
If you wish to defend him, as opposed espousing your ideals you get the whole package.
And it is a package on par with Murtha.
26 posted on
10/22/2009 10:12:04 PM PDT by
MrEdd
(Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
To: MrEdd
I’m not aware of what it is that you’re referring to, and again, I don’t hold with his foreign policy, but he’s a provocative representative, that generates thought and discussion about adherence to the Constitution, and I think that’s a welcome thing.
55 posted on
10/23/2009 9:10:37 AM PDT by
americanophile
(Sarcasm: satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson