What? WHAT? Of course he's been interfering in Honduras.
It's been in all the papers. Or, if you don't read papers, (who does?) on the blogs.
Isn’t Obama about to get into a war with North Korea? Doesn’t that get you off enough?
Well, the Norks specifically threatened to send a missle to hit Hawaii. I would think that would be a casus belli for even the most ardent "non-interventionists".
But considering you mentioned them, why wouldn't Paul?
Recently Ron Paul has been busy telling everyone who will listen that Congress and Obama are destroying America from the inside.
He has? Funny, you'd think with the opportunity to get some significant column inches in the Washington Times, he'd mention them once. Just once. Especially when discussing "our" foreign policy.
Of course, he mentions "neocons in both the Republican and Democratic parties" and that makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. Unless "neocon" means something else in his mind. I wonder what it could be...
Ron Paul has been one of the most consistent enemies of collectivism, socialism, and communism in the Congress. He identified our real mortal threat.
Then he might mention the recent "collectivist, socialist and communist" who was formerly president of Honduras. I'd look up his name, but Paul doesn't mention it in his article.
That's what you want, right? Or are you in favor of nonintervention in Honduras?
North Korea has threatened to nuke Hawaii, but that occurred after Obama threatened to blockade them. That was always considered an act of war in the past. The Democrat Party is back to its classic position of warmongering. Obama is clearly the aggressor with the "Norks".
I don't know why he didn't talk about honduras. Maybe because Obama has not used the excuse "If we don't fight the Hondurans down there, we'll have to fight them up here." argument, seeing as how that argument was the focus to the article.