There is not one word for Obama.
Not. One. Word.
I can only assume he supports the current policy -- whatever it is.
He mentions Honduras not at all and only mentions Mohammad Mosaddeq, Obama's favorite Iranian. You know him, the great parliamentarian who was "democratically elected" although that is a bit misleading:
According to Ervand Abrahamian: "Realizing that the opposition would take the vast majority of the provincial seats, Mossadeq stopped the voting as soon as 79 deputies – just enough to form a parliamentary quorum — had been elected."Charming.
I could tear this idiotic anti-Semite's rant to pieces for the right price, but one piece of imbecilic nonsense: "We stay out of the internal affairs of other nations. America should conduct trade, travel and diplomacy with all willing nations."
This geriatric crank doesn't actually look at the world. Trading IS interference. Starbucks is Imperialism. It doesn't matter what you do or don't do, your presence is interference. Look at Obama in Iran, he tried desperately not to interfere and they blamed it for him anyway.
BTW, what is Paul's opinion on Honduras? It'd be nice if his "philosophy" is to be adopted that he describe how it would be manifested with respect to situations that have occurred in the last half-century.
Hey, hasn’t Obama been staying the course in Iraq and Afghanistan and doesn’t he want to invade Pakistan?
If Obama hasn’t been itching to interfere in Honduras, then what is that?
Isn’t Obama about to get into a war with North Korea? Doesn’t that get you off enough?
Recently Ron Paul has been busy telling everyone who will listen that Congress and Obama are destroying America from the inside. No nukes from other countries are really needed to destroy America and enslave us.
The real enemy is inside and in the White House.
Ron Paul has been one of the most consistent enemies of collectivism, socialism, and communism in the Congress. He identified our real mortal threat.