1 posted on
12/08/2008 11:20:29 AM PST by
SecAmndmt
To: djsherin; rabscuttle; BGHater
2 posted on
12/08/2008 11:21:51 AM PST by
SecAmndmt
(Arm yourselves!)
To: Gondring; rabscuttle385; bamahead
3 posted on
12/08/2008 11:22:46 AM PST by
djsherin
(The federal government:: Because someone has to f*** things up!)
To: SecAmndmt
I heard some guy saying that if we didn’t have guns, we wouldn’t have the hundreds of accidental shootings and killing that happen to children and that those deaths out weigh the supposed (his words) benefits of an armed society. He failed to realize how many criminal attacks are stopped by the fact that someone produces a gun. It’s a huge deterrent and rarely does the gun need to actually be fired for the crime to be stopped.
Besides, there’s this thing called the 2nd Amendment.
4 posted on
12/08/2008 11:26:12 AM PST by
djsherin
(The federal government:: Because someone has to f*** things up!)
To: djsherin; Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; ...
5 posted on
12/08/2008 11:34:01 AM PST by
bamahead
(Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
To: SecAmndmt
In many areas, local police could become more and more absorbed with revenue generating activities, like minor traffic violations and the asset forfeiture opportunities of non-violent drug offenses. Your safety has always, ultimately been your own responsibility, but never more so than now. People have a natural right to defend themselves. Governments that take that away from their people should be highly suspectWhy how crazy. What a nut! Anyone who posts anything by Ron Paul should be banned for life < /sarcasm> (that is sarcasm for me, but not for a lot of so-called "conservative " freepers who stated those sentiments repeatedly in the last year or so.
6 posted on
12/08/2008 11:34:37 AM PST by
from occupied ga
(Your most dangerous enemy is your own government,)
To: SecAmndmt
As usual Ron Paul speaks the truth.
10 posted on
12/08/2008 12:21:53 PM PST by
Redhd2
To: SecAmndmt
I couldn’t back RP because of some of his leanings, especially in the WoT, but on 2nd Amendment issues, he has never wavered in support of law-abiding gunowners.
13 posted on
12/08/2008 12:42:07 PM PST by
Pistolshot
("Democrats don't show respect, they just demand respect " - ClearCase_guy)
To: SecAmndmt
PAUL’S A KOOK! THAT MEANS 9/11 TRUTHERS AND ANTI-WAR PEACENIKS WILL HAVE ACCESS TO GUNS!
To: All
Although Ron Paul makes a very good -- and extremely rare -- point about the value of guns in self-defense, he is still
painfully politically correct and multi-cultural. He wrote that "the world was reminded how evil and cruel people can be" when he
should have noted how evil and cruel MUSLIMS and JIHADIS can be. His whole article was about "terrorists" -- with not a single mention of the the stunning depravity and murderousness of MUSLIMS and JIHADIS.
This is sad and wrong. And it makes Ron Paul not very libertarian -- or very useful to the world.
41 posted on
12/10/2008 3:24:47 AM PST by
Zanton
(an advocate of classical liberalism and libertarianism)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson