To: LowCountryJoe
“With your loss, the Libertarian Party will continue to move forward to represent those American patriots who still believe in smaller government, lower taxes and more individual freedom.”
If the LP were anti-drug, pro-closed borders and strong on national security and pro-life, I’d vote for them.
49 posted on
02/08/2008 8:56:23 AM PST by
Grunthor
(Juan McAmnesty - The End of America; Comitted to Mexico and 100 *&**& years!!??)
To: Grunthor
Why? Are you afraid that without government restraining you, that you'd become a druggie? Or that you'd run out and get an abortion? Or that if welfare went away, that your brown-skinned neighbor might steal your job?
How much stronger on National Security do you need to be when one of your party planks is the Second Amendment expressed in a way that the GOP ignores? An armed civilian population is one of the best deterrents to both crime and terror.
50 posted on
02/08/2008 9:32:57 AM PST by
Dead Corpse
(What would a free man do?)
To: Grunthor
f the LP were anti-drug, pro-closed borders and strong on national security and pro-life There's that whole thing about smaller government for everybody not just people you don't like.
58 posted on
02/08/2008 9:37:50 PM PST by
garbanzo
(Government is not the solution to our problems. Government is the problem.)
To: Grunthor
If the LP were anti-drug, pro-closed borders and strong on national security and pro-life, Id vote for them. And then some other knucklehead comes along and want them to be for anti-gambling, no alcohol sales, smoking prohibition, health care entitlement asking for, class warfare rhetoric spewing embracer...and then you have a Social Conservative who has as much big-governmet tendencies than does a hard Left-leaning Democrat.
60 posted on
02/09/2008 7:10:45 AM PST by
LowCountryJoe
(Do class-warfare and disdain of laissez-faire have their places in today's GOP?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson