“I need more than what’s been provided so far . . . which is zero.”
False, and silly to deny that I gave you a link with multiple source documents. But that’s what I expect from the loony fringe of Ron Paulsters.
Simply put, you supporters of Doktor Herr Ron Paul, Esquire are being played by the left (Wonkette, Daily KOS) who last year publically decided to push Ron Paul as a spoiler. (Source: Daily KOS, Wonkette forum comments throughout 2007 - search for yourself, I’m not doing your own footwork)
Plus, you supporters tend to shout silliness when confronted with facts and deny you ever saw them. (source: your post)
Here’s where you can start, copy this address and paste it in your browser. That’s the thing you’re staring at right now. Browser. Hit Enter, it is a key on the flat thing your knuckles are resting against.
You will then magically appear to stare at text. This is the source. Try reading it without screaming RON PAUL IS GOD and you’ll be able to figure out what is written.
http://pajamasmedia.com/2008/01/ron_paul.php
Note that your fuehrer tried to distance himself by denying that his newsletter was in any way connected with his ideas (link on the source), even though he
1. Takes and keeps money from Neo Nazis (proven multiple times)
2. Gleefully approves appearances on Neo Nazi media and Truther 911 sedition media for interviews (again, proven multiple times)
3. Pretends that for over 10 years the crap spewed under his bannered name was a complete surprise to him, gosh.
He’s lying. There’s more proof condemning him than there is clearing him. He’s stupid, he has no concept of finance, money, banking, accounting, economics, electronic funds transfers, or especially the time concept of money. He’s a modern version of the Know-Nothings crossed with a determined Luddite streak a mile wide.
With a Prussian Blue-admiring neo-nazi cherry on top.
And that’s my last post on the subject. I don’t bother debating with socialists, nor with monarchists, tribalists, anarchists, communists, nazis or the pathetic crazies spouting conspiracy theories and pontificating about the Federal Reserve (a sure sign of dementia and/or stupidity).
None of those types of political “philosophies” are worth any rational person’s time. I don’t talk to people who are convinced that diet cola is made by outer space aliens either.
You are not comprehending my posts.
I’m asking for proof that Paul had any kind of executive or editorial power with the newsletters that bore his name.
I didn’t ask about what quotes were in them so I don’t need them posted to me for the umpteenth time.
Please stick with the subject at hand and try to show me proof that Paul had executive or editorial control over the newsletters carrying his name.
Just the fact that the newsletters carried his name means nothing. We have an arena in town called the Amway Arena. Just because the Amway name is over the arena doesn’t mean that Amway controls who is booked to play there or what they say while they are there.
Despite your lengthy diatribes, the only answer you have to Ron Paul is:
“pick one: Mitt Romney, Rudy Giuliani, John McCain, Fred Thompson, Mike Huckabee”
Thank you for that useless rant.