If this holds true, Ron Paul and Mitt Romney would be the only two Republican candidates consistently placing among the top 3.
To: Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; Allerious; ...
Online oddsmakers have Ron Paul in a comfortable third place finish among bettors in both the Republican Iowa Caucus and the New Hampshire primary.
If this holds true, Ron Paul and Mitt Romney would be the only two Republican candidates consistently placing among the top 3.
Libertarian ping! To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
2 posted on
01/03/2008 6:46:18 AM PST by
SubGeniusX
(The People have Unenumerated Rights, The Government does not have Unenumerated Powers!)
To: SubGeniusX
It is scary indeed that Republicans would vote for a candidate with the views of RP (cut and run) because he has money in the bank (especially given where so much of that money is coming from).
3 posted on
01/03/2008 7:02:02 AM PST by
svcw
(There is no plan B.)
To: SubGeniusX
Paul is at 10% in Iowa, tied with McCain and essentially tied with Thompson (who was at 11% today). That puts only Huckabee and Romney ahead of that group. (Incidentally, it also means Paul should be eligible for Fox's next debate, by their own standards.)
What will be interesting is if the enthusiasm and spirit of Paul supporters translates into significantly higher turnout percentages than other candidates achieve. Purely as a hypothetical example, if he were to have 90% of his Iowan supporters caucus, while other candidates averaged only 30% of their supporters at the caucus, then Paul's 10% poll numbers suddenly equal Huckabee's 30% poll numbers, and may better them depending on how biased the poll actually is.
5 posted on
01/03/2008 7:22:59 AM PST by
Turbopilot
(iumop ap!sdn w,I 'aw dlaH)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson