[George W. Bush]

The one thing that always blows me away about the Ron Paul debate, is that who would have ever though that simply “following the Constitution in domestic and foreign policy” would become some a contentious and revolutionary idea in DC? And why should it be? Isn’t that what we should have elected Congress and any president to do?

Because the two establishment parties only debate minor differences in domestic and foreign policy. And most of their favored policies are not authorized by or are directly forbidden by the Constitution.

Hence, the constant attacks. Ron Paul is dangerous because he tells the voters that the emperor(s) have no clothes.

It scares the hell out of both parties.

[Stevieboy]

Because the two establishment parties only debate minor differences in domestic and foreign policy.

And I would elaborate by saying that they debate about how and to what degree they shall rule and control us, as opposed to the real issue of control/socialism vs. liberty, individuality and personal responsibility.

[dread78645]

Ron Paul is dangerous because he tells the voters that the emperor(s) have no clothes.